Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Inconsistent field prefixes #28

Open
duckontheweb opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Inconsistent field prefixes #28

duckontheweb opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@duckontheweb
Labels
change Involves change to existing spec question Further information is requested

Comments

@duckontheweb
Copy link
Collaborator

Why do two fields have a model_ prefix and the other don't have it. Seems a bit inconsistent. I see a justification for model_type if another "type" gets introduced. I could imaging that a general "type": "Model" could be nice to distinguish files with similar semantics, e.g. as in STAC.

Originally raised in #25
@duckontheweb duckontheweb added question Further information is requested change Involves change to existing spec labels Sep 7, 2021
@duckontheweb duckontheweb self-assigned this Sep 7, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@duckontheweb duckontheweb

Labels
change Involves change to existing spec question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@duckontheweb