You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 20, 2026. It is now read-only.
Re: this email thread, I wanted to change a package name from Titlecase to lowercase. This didn't work, but renaming it to a different name and then back to the lowercase version did work. E.g.:
This works:
Mypackage -> Mypackage-temp -> mypackage
But not
Mypackage -> mypackage
As Tony pointed out in the email thread, it likely prevents the direct rename because the new name conflicts with "an existing" package (i.e. itself).
Also, last time I checked (which could have been months ago), raco pkg install <pkgname> did not find the package unless the Titlecase name was used, and likewise in info.rkt, the Titlecase name was needed to indicate the dependency or it would not be found. Since names differing only in case are considered equivalent for the purposes of uniqueness, should this not perhaps also hold for raco and info.rkt? i.e. raco pkg install should tolerate case variation to install the unique package that such varying names could refer to (whatever the "preserved" case of that package name may be).
Re: this email thread, I wanted to change a package name from Titlecase to lowercase. This didn't work, but renaming it to a different name and then back to the lowercase version did work. E.g.:
This works:
Mypackage -> Mypackage-temp -> mypackageBut not
Mypackage -> mypackageAs Tony pointed out in the email thread, it likely prevents the direct rename because the new name conflicts with "an existing" package (i.e. itself).
Also, last time I checked (which could have been months ago),
raco pkg install <pkgname>did not find the package unless the Titlecase name was used, and likewise ininfo.rkt, the Titlecase name was needed to indicate the dependency or it would not be found. Since names differing only in case are considered equivalent for the purposes of uniqueness, should this not perhaps also hold forracoandinfo.rkt? i.e. raco pkg install should tolerate case variation to install the unique package that such varying names could refer to (whatever the "preserved" case of that package name may be).For reference, this is the package that was renamed: https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/package/relation