Map functions with vctrs semantics

[tzakharko]

It appreas that the ecosystem is still lacking a map primitive with vctrs-compatible semantics. I recall there was an effort to implement mapping as part of vctrs (e.g. #1227), which was abandoned in favour of map_vec() in purrr. However, purrr does not offer vctrs-compatible semantics, in particular it has inconsistent treatment of data frames (see for example tidyverse/purrr#838).

I believe that the vctrs approach to treating tables as row-iterable vectors is very powerful and allows the intuitive composition of complex data. This semantics also powers many advanced features within dplyr. Are there plans to bring this to list iteration?

[DavisVaughan]

treating tables as row-iterable vectors

slider::slide() does exactly that and is likely as close as we will get
https://slider.r-lib.org/articles/rowwise.html

It uses vctrs iteration under the hood and is mostly implemented in C to make it as fast as possible, but it still does have to callback to R to call the .f function on every row

[tzakharko]

Thanks, @DavisVaughan! I was not aware that slider is positioned as a general solution to this problem (my hope that there were plans for this in vctrs or purrr). I suppose that's another package to add to the dependency list :)

[DavisVaughan]

slider is well maintained and as lightweight dependency wise as purrr, so it should work pretty well for your use cases, I think!