We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<<unknown>>
(edit: not sure how the reprex lost its formatting, but I fixed it)
The new footnotes feature might be useful for us at {tinkr}, but I'm not sure how to parse them as each footnote contains identical tags.
footnotes
from: ropensci/tinkr#92 (comment)
txt <- c("a statement[^1][^2]\n", "[^1]: this is true", "[^2]: this is false") commonmark::markdown_xml(txt, footnotes = TRUE) |> writeLines() #> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> #> <!DOCTYPE document SYSTEM "CommonMark.dtd"> #> <document xmlns="http://commonmark.org/xml/1.0"> #> <paragraph> #> <text xml:space="preserve">a statement</text> #> <<unknown> /> #> <<unknown> /> #> </paragraph> #> <<unknown>> #> <paragraph> #> <text xml:space="preserve">this is true</text> #> </paragraph> #> </<unknown>> #> <<unknown>> #> <paragraph> #> <text xml:space="preserve">this is false</text> #> </paragraph> #> </<unknown>> #> </document>
Created on 2023-03-22 with reprex v2.0.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ew that's weird. Posted it upstream here: github/cmark-gfm#316
Sorry, something went wrong.
I've added a potential fix for this in github/cmark-gfm#362, but I'm not sure how active the maintainers are there.
No branches or pull requests
(edit: not sure how the reprex lost its formatting, but I fixed it)
The new
footnotes
feature might be useful for us at {tinkr}, but I'm not sure how to parse them as each footnote contains identical tags.from: ropensci/tinkr#92 (comment)
Created on 2023-03-22 with reprex v2.0.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: