is utils.losses redundant? #887
Philip1435
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi, thanks for the question, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was working with Diceloss and found that there are two places it is written:
losses/dice
andutils/losses
. I used the latter one at first and did not get the outcome I expected, but then found success with the first one. I am here asking if there is any use forutils/losses
or is it actually redundant and someone forgot to clean it?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions