Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

please upgrade to Pandoc 3.6.3 #12074

Closed
jonassmedegaard opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

please upgrade to Pandoc 3.6.3 #12074

jonassmedegaard opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
support a request for support

Comments

@jonassmedegaard
Copy link

Pandoc 3.6.3 improves handling of quotation markers and LaTeX multilingual settings, both improving the use with non-english and multilingual documents.

Please consider upgrading to Pandoc 3.6.3, also for the stable v1.6 branch, if not too much hassle.

@mcanouil
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for suggesting the upgrade to Pandoc 3.6.3 and for highlighting its improvements. We understand the benefits it offers for handling quotation markers and LaTeX multilingual settings.

However, upgrading dependencies like Pandoc across all branches isn't how our versioning and dependency management process works. Quarto upgrades its dependencies once per release to ensure stability and compatibility. Including Pandoc 3.6.3 in future releases will be considered during our next update cycle.

We appreciate your understanding and continued support.

@mcanouil mcanouil added the support a request for support label Feb 13, 2025
@jonassmedegaard
Copy link
Author

Ah, understood. I feel the pain of the Pandoc dependency chain myself in the Debian packaging of that marvellous tool, and just hoped that you somehow had a simpler route to upgrading it.

Are such constraints in pace of upgrading components perhaps documentet somewhere? Perfectly understood if not (I mean, it isn't explicitly documented in Debian either).

@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Feb 13, 2025

Are such constraints in pace of upgrading components perhaps documentet somewhere? Perfectly understood if not (I mean, it isn't explicitly documented in Debian either).

Not in details but we mentioned the policy here.
https://quarto.org/docs/faq/#development-and-maintenance

@quarto-dev quarto-dev locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 13, 2025
@cderv cderv converted this issue into discussion #12077 Feb 13, 2025

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
support a request for support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants