Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add possibility to distinguish VAT-opted properties #128

Open
ghost opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #148
Open

Add possibility to distinguish VAT-opted properties #128

ghost opened this issue Jul 6, 2020 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #148
Assignees
Labels
Business need unclear Business cases are being discussed but not decided yet. Feature Request Missing functionality and changes

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 6, 2020

Problem description
Investment properties can either be opted to tax or not (VAT).
This information might be relevant for a transaction but is not available in SwissRETS.

Ist ein Objekt MWST-optiert, so unterliegt der Bruttomietzins der Mehrwertsteuer.
Dadurch kann der Vorsteuerabzug geltend gemacht werden.

Desired Solution
A way to indicate whether a property is opted to tax or not.
This information is relevant predominantly for the transaction of investment properties.

For regular rental properties that information might not be too relevant.

@jensstalder
Copy link
Collaborator

@rgutzwiller
I'm sorry for my ignorance within the real-estate business. What do you think is the default. opted or not opted. This depends how we implement it:
<isVatOpted>applies</isVatOpted> or <isVatExempt>applies</isVatExempt> Or what would be an appropriate characteristic? Just to make sure interpretation is correct by default aka. intuitively.

@jensstalder jensstalder moved this from To do to In progress in Investment Properties Oct 30, 2020
@jensstalder jensstalder self-assigned this Nov 2, 2020
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 3, 2020

Default is not opted for VAT and does not need to me mentioned explicitly, if a property is opted for VAT then it needs to be mentioned.

This concerns mainly renting of garages or commercial real estate (e.g. a company rents out a garage to a private person without this person also renting a flat where they live, or if a company rents out an office/commercial property to another company or private person.

@jensstalder jensstalder linked a pull request Nov 4, 2020 that will close this issue
@jensstalder jensstalder linked a pull request Nov 4, 2020 that will close this issue
@jensstalder jensstalder added the Feature Request Missing functionality and changes label Nov 13, 2020
@jensstalder jensstalder moved this from In progress to Review in progress in Investment Properties Nov 13, 2020
@jensstalder jensstalder added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Nov 30, 2020
@jensstalder jensstalder added the Business need unclear Business cases are being discussed but not decided yet. label Dec 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Business need unclear Business cases are being discussed but not decided yet. Feature Request Missing functionality and changes
Projects
Investment Properties
Review in progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant