You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it will not give advantage. Because it will require channel switch with delay on each step and twice more time on measurement. I think it may take even more time than two separate "scanraw" requests for CH0 and CH1...
But for "data" command it will be faster, because data for both channels already exists when "data" command is executed.
Would it be nice if scan raw could output the raw CH0 and CH1 data in one sweep?
most time is spend when changing frequency so this may be faster
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: