Skip to content

Add flush() to HTMLParser to fill gap after implementation change #157003

Description

@ianjosephwilson

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

With recent changes it isn't clear when the the parser actually does the parsing/processing anymore on the data given to feed().

Changes were made in #153030 , (seen in 3.14.7), which leave this gap in the HTMLParser.

Propose adding a flush method as seen below ( I reset the parse threshold to 1 which differs from my proposal on discuss, seems appropriate?):

class PrototypeHTMLParser(HTMLParser):

    def flush(self):
        """
        Process all data fed insofar as it contains complete elements any remaining data remains buffered.
        """
        if self._pending:
            self.rawdata += ''.join(self._pending)
            self._pending.clear()
            self._pending_len = 0
            self._parse_threshold = 1
        # Perform incremental parsing but its not EOF.
        self.goahead(0)

Example

from html.parser import HTMLParser


class FlushableHTMLParser(HTMLParser):
    """
    Parser with flush implemented.

    This would be meant to be added to the existing HTMLParser.
    """
    def flush(self):
        if self._pending:
            self.rawdata += ''.join(self._pending)
            self._pending.clear()
            self._pending_len = 0
            self._parse_threshold = 1
        self.goahead(0)


class DemoHTMLParser(FlushableHTMLParser):

    def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
        print (f'Found starttag {tag=} {len(attrs)=}')

    def handle_endtag(self, tag):
        print (f'Found endtag {tag=}')


def parse(html_str_parts: list[str]):
    parser = DemoHTMLParser()
    for part in html_str_parts:
        print (f'Feed {len(part)}')
        parser.feed(part)
    print ('')
    print ('Calling flush()')
    parser.flush()
    print ('Calling close()')
    parser.close()


def demo_attrs(attrs_len):
    print (f'\nDemo with {attrs_len=}')
    print ('='*20)
    attrs = [f" a{i}='1'" for i in range(attrs_len)]
    parse(["<div", *attrs, ">", "content", "</div>"])


if __name__ == '__main__':
    for attrs_len in (2, 8):
        demo_attrs(attrs_len)

Demo with attrs_len=2
====================
Feed 4
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 1
Feed 7
Found starttag tag='div' len(attrs)=2
Feed 6
Found endtag tag='div'

Calling flush()
Calling close()

Demo with attrs_len=8
====================
Feed 4
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 7
Feed 1
Feed 7
Feed 6

Calling flush()
Found starttag tag='div' len(attrs)=8
Found endtag tag='div'
Calling close()

Other Doc Changes

I think the feed() doc string also needs a cleanup to match these changes. Should that also be part of this issue?

Handling EOF

There is a related issue about how can a stdlib user determine what should be done when close() is called and data is discarded. Specifically from the living spec, eof-in-tag error case. I'm going to link it but include the text here as well:

This error occurs if the parser encounters the end of the input stream in a start tag or an end tag (e.g., <div id=). Such a tag is ignored.

Should I start that in discuss in the same thread as before or make another issue about that? Maybe it is beyond the scope of the python stdlib parser? It seems like a hard problem but it kind of makes the parser into partial solution in certain use cases.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

https://discuss.python.org/t/proposal-add-new-method-to-htmlparser-flush-self-str/108855

Linked PRs

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

3.16new features, bugs and security fixesstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-featureA feature request or enhancement

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions