You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@rtimms@noelhallemans, in my research group at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, we've defined lumped-parameter LIB/LMB models with slightly different variable names ("vcell [V]" instead of "Voltage [V]" and "iapp [A]" instead of "Current [A]"). Rather than reference "Voltage [V]" and "Current [A]" directly in the EISSimulation class, could these names be passed to the initializer for improved generality with model definitions?
Also: we'd find it useful to evaluate the frequency response of a cell's internal variables (in addition to the cell-level impedance) for comparison with our transfer function models. Do you have thoughts on what changes are needed to support this?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@rtimms @noelhallemans, in my research group at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, we've defined lumped-parameter LIB/LMB models with slightly different variable names ("vcell [V]" instead of "Voltage [V]" and "iapp [A]" instead of "Current [A]"). Rather than reference "Voltage [V]" and "Current [A]" directly in the EISSimulation class, could these names be passed to the initializer for improved generality with model definitions?
Also: we'd find it useful to evaluate the frequency response of a cell's internal variables (in addition to the cell-level impedance) for comparison with our transfer function models. Do you have thoughts on what changes are needed to support this?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: