Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document level annotation #127

Open
ahurriyetoglu opened this issue Jan 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

document level annotation #127

ahurriyetoglu opened this issue Jan 5, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@ahurriyetoglu
Copy link

I would like to use FLAT for annotating documents for a classification task. Ideally, a document should be displayed to the user, the user should be able to select one (maybe multible) labels and press next.

Would this feature be easy/practical to be developed? Please let me know if you would have time for it or I should attempt to create a pull request for it.

@proycon proycon self-assigned this Jan 5, 2018
@proycon
Copy link
Owner

proycon commented Jan 22, 2018

I think this would be an interesting addition to FLAT. The classification label could be stored in the metadata (or as a metric on the text itself). It needs some careful thought and I'm a bit busy currently so can't start this before february.

@proycon
Copy link
Owner

proycon commented Jan 22, 2018

12:27 <OsmanMutlu> If it is going to be a new mode
12:27 <OsmanMutlu> i don't think it should
12:27 <proycon> well, it can reuse the viewer mode
12:28 <proycon> like the editor does
12:28 <proycon> or do you want to classify and do annotation edits at the same time?
12:28 <OsmanMutlu> yes
12:28 <proycon> ah ok
12:28 <OsmanMutlu> because metadata editor mode is a way to do it already
12:28 <proycon> yeah
12:29 <proycon> but it's a bit cumbersome, I understand
12:29 <proycon> you want faster clicks and previous/next

@proycon
Copy link
Owner

proycon commented Jan 22, 2018

Further brainstorm logs:

12:30 <Kobus_home> a <text> may have Feature's. Maybe that does the trick?
12:31 <proycon> and have the annotation focus be the whole text... 
12:31 <proycon> hmm
12:31 <proycon> not sure
12:31 <Kobus_home> Polarity feature
12:32 <proycon> why not just <text class> even in that case
12:32 <proycon> (do we even allow that?)
12:32 <proycon> that might make most sense.. a text in a set , with a class
12:32 <proycon> but the text itself has no declaration currently :$
12:32 <proycon> would require a FoLiA extension
12:33 <proycon> but might be the most elegant way..
12:33 <proycon> and doesn't even need a lot of FLAT adaptations then...
12:33 <Kobus_home> a text is an AbstractStructure, and may have a class, according to the properties
12:33 <proycon> indeed
12:34 <proycon> that does seem most elegant..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants