Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for persistent 2.5 #137

Open
felixonmars opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 11 comments
Open

Support for persistent 2.5 #137

felixonmars opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 11 comments

Comments

@felixonmars
Copy link

It would be nice to support the latest version of persistent 2.5 series.
@hlian hlian mentioned this issue May 2, 2016
Closed
@peti
Copy link

peti commented Jun 5, 2016

Yes, that would be very nice indeed! As it is now, esqueleto has effectively been removed from Stackage because it's blocking other packages. 😢

ilovezfs added a commit to ilovezfs/git-annex that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2016
@ilovezfs
cabal constraints for aws and esqueleto
0118a7b 
aws 0.14.0 is incompatible with http-conduit 2.2.0
aristidb/aws#206

esqueleto 2.4.3 is incompatible with persistent 2.5
prowdsponsor/esqueleto#137
prowdsponsor/esqueleto#141
prowdsponsor/esqueleto#139

Solver needs these hints when building git-annex with +S3 and +Webapp.
@ilovezfs
Copy link

Any progress on this? Downstream is now starting to patch around this.

@peti peti mentioned this issue Sep 8, 2016
Open
@tebello-thejane tebello-thejane mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2016
Open
@mrkkrp
Copy link

mrkkrp commented Sep 17, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Now that lts-7.0 is out with GHC 8.0 we cannot switch to it solely because of esqueleto. @meteficha Any chance you take 5 minutes and merge a PR that addresses this?

@vandenoever vandenoever mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2016
Closed
@qrilka
Copy link

qrilka commented Oct 21, 2016

@meteficha was this project abandoned?

@wyager
Copy link

wyager commented Oct 26, 2016

What's going on here? Looks like @vandenoever fixed it but didn't submit a PR to upstream Esqueleto?

@qrilka
Copy link

qrilka commented Oct 26, 2016

@wyager I've created alternative PR #153 but I will be happy to close it in favor of more proper one

@vandenoever
Copy link

@wyager It was @tebello-thejane who fixed it for my use-case with #150. I cannot say which is the better PR.

@mrkkrp
Copy link

mrkkrp commented Oct 26, 2016

Maybe we should contact them at [email protected] and ask if this is maintained and if not, someone could take over it?

@clinty
Copy link

clinty commented Oct 27, 2016

Perhaps an issue at https://github.com/haskell-infra/hackage-trustees/issues ?

@bitemyapp bitemyapp mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2016
Closed
@winterland1989 winterland1989 mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2016
Closed
@nd2s
Copy link

nd2s commented Jan 22, 2017

I suggest updating this ticket to be about persistent-2.6 and base-4.9.0.0, because we have a esqueleto-2.5.0 version now, but it still can't be use with lts-7.x because it's too old.

@ilovezfs
Copy link

@nd2s the new maintainer's repository is here: https://github.com/bitemyapp/esqueleto

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
9 participants
@peti @qrilka @clinty @nd2s @vandenoever @wyager @felixonmars @ilovezfs @mrkkrp