|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +PDR: 11 |
| 3 | +Title: Project Committee |
| 4 | +Category: Process |
| 5 | +Status: Pending |
| 6 | +Authors: |
| 7 | + - Christina Gianelloni <[email protected]> |
| 8 | +Created: 2025-10-18 |
| 9 | +--- |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +# Project Committee Charter (Phase 2) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## I. Legal Basis and Purpose |
| 14 | +1. In accordance with Articles 4, 5 and 22 of the PRAGMA Statutes, the Project Committee (“PC”) is established as a standing body, delegated by the Administrative Board (“AB”) and approved by the General Assembly (“GA”). |
| 15 | +2. The PC’s mandate is to evaluate, recommend and oversee projects operating under PRAGMA’s umbrella, ensuring that they: |
| 16 | + - align with PRAGMA’s mission and open-source principles; |
| 17 | + - adhere to governance, reporting and transparency standards; and |
| 18 | + - maintain progress toward long-term community sustainability. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## II. Composition and Appointment |
| 21 | +1. **Membership & Eligibility** |
| 22 | + - The PC shall be composed of **community members**, not limited to PRAGMA’s formal membership. |
| 23 | + - Applicants should demonstrate relevant experience in open-source development, governance, community management, or blockchain-related technology. |
| 24 | + - Efforts should be made to ensure diversity in geography, professional background and ecosystem representation. |
| 25 | +2. **Number of Members** |
| 26 | + - The Committee shall consist of a minimum of **three (3)** and a maximum of **five (5)** members, depending on workload and project volume. |
| 27 | +3. **Application & Selection Process** |
| 28 | + - The AB shall issue a **public call for applications**, describing the role, expected workload and selection criteria. |
| 29 | + - Interested individuals submit an application outlining their background, qualifications and potential conflicts of interest. |
| 30 | + - The AB reviews all submissions and appoints members by majority vote, based on merit, expertise and balance across disciplines. |
| 31 | +4. **Term of Service** |
| 32 | + - PC members serve a **one-year renewable term**. |
| 33 | + - Vacancies during the term may be filled by the AB for the remainder of that term. |
| 34 | +5. **Removal** |
| 35 | + - Members may be removed by majority vote of the AB for cause (misconduct, breach of confidentiality, or repeated non-participation). |
| 36 | + - Members may resign in writing at any time. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +## III. Officers |
| 39 | +1. The PC elects from among its members a **Chair** and a **Secretary** annually. |
| 40 | + - The Chair facilitates meetings and acts as liaison to the AB. |
| 41 | + - The Secretary maintains minutes, records and the status of project evaluations. |
| 42 | +2. Elections occur during the first meeting after appointment. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +## IV. Meetings and Operations |
| 45 | +1. The PC may meet virtually or in person. |
| 46 | +2. A quorum shall consist of a simple majority of active members. |
| 47 | +3. Decisions are made by majority vote; the Chair casts the deciding vote in case of a tie. |
| 48 | +4. Meeting minutes and all formal decisions shall be recorded and published in PRAGMA’s documentation repository. |
| 49 | +5. The PC submits **quarterly summary reports** to the Administrative Board (per Article 22(h) of the Statutes). |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +## V. Mandate and Scope |
| 52 | +The PC operates under delegation from the AB to manage the following responsibilities: |
| 53 | +1. **Project Intake & Evaluation** — Vetting and recommending new projects for incubation. |
| 54 | +2. **Oversight of Active Projects** — Monitoring progress and compliance. |
| 55 | +3. **Reporting & Documentation** — Ensuring projects deliver timely and transparent reports. |
| 56 | +4. **Advisory Role** — Providing input to the AB regarding project health, graduation or termination. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +## VI. Duties and Responsibilities |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### A. Evaluation & Selection |
| 61 | +- Review **Prospective Project** submissions (per PDR-0003) to ensure: |
| 62 | + - Alignment with PRAGMA’s goals and vision. |
| 63 | + - Open-source licensing willing to donate to PRAGMA. |
| 64 | + - Legal and IP soundness. |
| 65 | + - Has a clear roadmap alligned with its objectives |
| 66 | +- Conduct follow-up interviews or Q&A when necessary. |
| 67 | +- Provide written recommendations and scores to the AB for decision. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +### B. Oversight of Incubating Projects |
| 70 | +- Assign a **Guide** essentially a liaison for each incubating project. |
| 71 | +- Review and assess quarterly reports, ensuring timely submission and transparency. |
| 72 | +- Validate adherence to roadmap, governance model and PRAGMA’s ethical and legal standards. |
| 73 | +- Identify at-risk projects and recommend interventions or discontinuation. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +### C. Transition to Maintainer Committee |
| 76 | +- After multiple successful quarters, prepare recommendations to the AB for **GA referral** to establish a Maintainer Committee (per Article 5(2) of the Statutes). The decision to accept or reject the project is based on meeting the following requirements: |
| 77 | + - The project must have more than three active contributors. |
| 78 | + - The project must have demonstrated its ability to grow by offering a clear path to join its new contributors. |
| 79 | + - The project made at least three, acceptable releases. |
| 80 | + - The project provides timely quarterly reports. |
| 81 | + - The project's name is clear and free of trademark disputes, cultural appropriation, and other issues. |
| 82 | + - The source code was either only developed by project team members or accepted by using a DCO. |
| 83 | + - The source code is licensed under a PRAGMA-approved license with PRAGMA as the owner. |
| 84 | +- Ensure each new Maintainer Committee submits its organizational regulations for AB approval. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### D. Reporting & Documentation |
| 87 | +- Maintain a register of all PRAGMA Projects and their status (Prospective, Incubating, Maintainer). |
| 88 | +- Archive all applications, evaluations and reports in PRAGMA’s repository. |
| 89 | +- Submit a comprehensive **Annual Oversight Report** summarizing: |
| 90 | + - Active projects |
| 91 | + - Compliance rates |
| 92 | + - Recommended changes to process or oversight mechanisms |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +### E. Support & Coordination |
| 95 | +- Act as a knowledge and coordination hub among projects. |
| 96 | +- Facilitate shared infrastructure, Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment and documentation practices. |
| 97 | +- Support new project teams through onboarding and guidance on governance, licensing and contributor processes. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +## VII. Application Workflow |
| 100 | +1. **Call for Applications:** PC announces open calls for new projects at least **twice per year**. |
| 101 | +2. **Submission:** Applicants complete a standardized form (per PDR-0003) and submit required materials. |
| 102 | +3. **Review:** PC verifies completeness and evaluates proposals, selecting to make recommendations. |
| 103 | +4. **Recommendation:** Recommended projects forwarded to the AB for approval or rejection. |
| 104 | +5. **Incubation Phase:** Approved projects enter incubation under PC oversight. |
| 105 | +6. **Graduation:** After three releases, the PC may recommend project graduation to the AB for approval or rejection if acceptance criteria has been met. |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +## VIII. Conflict of Interest |
| 108 | +- All members must disclose actual or potential conflicts, including employment or funding ties to projects under review. |
| 109 | +- Conflicted members must abstain from related discussions and votes. |
| 110 | +- Disclosures are publicly logged in the meeting records. |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +## IX. Phase Transition |
| 113 | +During **Phase 1**, Maintainer Committees report directly to the Administrative Board (per PDR-0008). |
| 114 | +Upon **Phase 2 activation by the General Assembly**, reporting responsibilities transition to the Project Committee, which will assume direct oversight of PRAGMA Projects and make recommendations to the Administrative Board per Article 4(2) and 22(f–h). |
0 commit comments