Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optional element in sequences #348

Open
jenshweber opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Optional element in sequences #348

jenshweber opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@jenshweber
Copy link

Hello,
I am trying to understand the behaviour of the option element in the FancySeq example on the Readme page.
The following throws a validation error:

(s/validate FancySeq ["test" 1 2 3])

Why is this so? I think it should validate fine, since they keyword is optional.
Is this a bug, or do I fail to understand the notion of optionality?
Thanks
Jens

@w01fe
Copy link
Member

w01fe commented Mar 18, 2016

Not a bug, the semantics is that if an optional element is not present, the
sequence must stop there. I.e. in regex it's like (o1 (o2 r_)?)? not o1?
o2? r_

We will try to clarify that in the readme, or if you want to take a crack
at it that would be even better :). Thanks!

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 4:56 AM Jens Weber [email protected] wrote:

Hello,
I am trying to understand the behaviour of the option element in the
FancySeq example on the Readme page.
The following throws a validation error:

(s/validate FancySeq ["test" 1 2 3])

Why is this so? I think it should validate fine, since they keyword is
optional.
Is this a bug, or do I fail to understand the notion of optionality?
Thanks
Jens


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#348

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants