You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The pipeline standards descriptions are fantastic, but could be improved by explicitly stating exactly how the standard can be met and how it can be verified that the standard has in fact been met.
Here I propose for each standard including 2 additional statements:
"To meet this standard..."
"To verify this standard..."
This will clear up ambiguities for both developers and reviewers. The goal is to define what pieces of information must be available to reviewers to receive verification of standards being met.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The pipeline standards descriptions are fantastic, but could be improved by explicitly stating exactly how the standard can be met and how it can be verified that the standard has in fact been met.
Here I propose for each standard including 2 additional statements:
"To meet this standard..."
"To verify this standard..."
This will clear up ambiguities for both developers and reviewers. The goal is to define what pieces of information must be available to reviewers to receive verification of standards being met.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: