You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm missing an option where the search would return all results where part of the username/title matches the typed characters (*searchstring*). And not only results, starting at position 1 (searchstring*)
I was looking at the code and I found the jQuery.autocomplete (v1.11) widget is used. By default this widget should return any matching entry: source: https://api.jqueryui.com/1.10/autocomplete/
But I can't seem to find where the cIPJQ and jQuery differ and create a PR. I tried to compare the unminified sources from cIPJQ and jQuery, but due to all the minified function- and variablenames, it's hard to compare.
Or am I looking at the wrong files?
Any suggestions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
UPDATE
I found it was not related to jQueryUI. But the function cipAutocomplete.onSource did a search on index equal to zero. Changing the check to greater or equal to zero allows for wildcard searches.
Is there a deliberate reason for making the index=0-check? Otherwise I'll make this into a PR. I'll try and make this change conditional and create a setting in the options page to allow for both strict/username only searches or any part of the KeePass entry.
I'm missing an option where the search would return all results where part of the username/title matches the typed characters (
*searchstring*
). And not only results, starting at position 1 (searchstring*
)I was looking at the code and I found the jQuery.autocomplete (v1.11) widget is used. By default this widget should return any matching entry:
source: https://api.jqueryui.com/1.10/autocomplete/
But I can't seem to find where the cIPJQ and jQuery differ and create a PR.
I tried to compare the unminified sources from cIPJQ and jQuery, but due to all the minified function- and variablenames, it's hard to compare.
Or am I looking at the wrong files?
Any suggestions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: