You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks so much for making this code available! I'm working with the R version of your code, but I have a question about the way you manipulate the "local" data matrix, as in the code block from your example below:
Why do you fill the init_sh_ind_ variable with zeros for the non-initial year entries? So your initial shares come from the year 1980, but you rework the data matrix so that the initial share is set equal to zero in all non-1980 years. Why are the shares not set equal to the initial shares in all years? Afterall, this is how the original data matrix is constructed.
Thanks for the help, and thanks again for the code! Very helpful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe I will let Paul expound on the design decision later, but the effect of the code is to generate the interactions between year dummies and the initial industry shares. For example, if I limit to industry no. 100, the code produces the following:
Hi Paul,
Thanks so much for making this code available! I'm working with the
R
version of your code, but I have a question about the way you manipulate the "local" data matrix, as in the code block from your example below:Why do you fill the
init_sh_ind_
variable with zeros for the non-initial year entries? So your initial shares come from the year 1980, but you rework the data matrix so that the initial share is set equal to zero in all non-1980 years. Why are the shares not set equal to the initial shares in all years? Afterall, this is how the original data matrix is constructed.Thanks for the help, and thanks again for the code! Very helpful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: