You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The algorithm here gives best result with SMT-4 mode in POWER-8 as shown in below image. This is reflected in front-end-stall-cycles from perf tool being the least for SMT-4 mode.
The same is found for Intel indicating HT-2 mode is the best for the proposed algorithm by showing least execution time among all modes.
The Intel Xeon Phi doesn't support front-end stall cycles counter. So is there any performance counter in Intel Xeon Phi-2(Knights Landing) architecture which can indicate HT-2 is the best in the given case? Or is there any other way to prove HT-2 is the best?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The algorithm here gives best result with SMT-4 mode in POWER-8 as shown in below image. This is reflected in
front-end-stall-cycles
from perf tool being the least for SMT-4 mode.The same is found for Intel indicating HT-2 mode is the best for the proposed algorithm by showing least execution time among all modes.
The Intel Xeon Phi doesn't support
front-end stall cycles
counter. So is there any performance counter in Intel Xeon Phi-2(Knights Landing) architecture which can indicate HT-2 is the best in the given case? Or is there any other way to prove HT-2 is the best?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: