Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Required performance counter for selecting best Hyper-Threading(HT) mode in Intel Xeon Phi. #15

Open
parthsl opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@parthsl
Copy link
Owner

parthsl commented Mar 27, 2018

The algorithm here gives best result with SMT-4 mode in POWER-8 as shown in below image. This is reflected in front-end-stall-cycles from perf tool being the least for SMT-4 mode.


smt

The same is found for Intel indicating HT-2 mode is the best for the proposed algorithm by showing least execution time among all modes.
ht_modes

The Intel Xeon Phi doesn't support front-end stall cycles counter. So is there any performance counter in Intel Xeon Phi-2(Knights Landing) architecture which can indicate HT-2 is the best in the given case? Or is there any other way to prove HT-2 is the best?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant