Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

-passive Option Is Ignored #1052

Open
z0kk opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

-passive Option Is Ignored #1052

z0kk opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@z0kk
Copy link

z0kk commented Jan 16, 2025

This affects the version that come with Kali, the binary in the repo, and when installing from source:

go

The logs also report that certain results were removed because they couldn't be resolved.

This doesn't happen with the version that's installed with Snap:

snap

Unfortunately, that version has a different issue which I describe at #1051 (and have since closed because it only affects the Snap version).

@z0kk
Copy link
Author

z0kk commented Jan 20, 2025

Just a quick follow-up on this. According to the docs, Amass has three modes:

  • Normal - The enum subcommand without specifying active or passive will grab subdomains from the data sources and use DNS to validate them.
  • Active - Includes grabbing TLS certs, doing DNS zone transfers, NSEC walking, etc.
  • Passive - Blindly accept data from the data sources, without attempting to validate them.

So passive mode is what I'm attempting to run. However, I notice that the current help shows that passive is now the default mode (and the -passive option is deprecated). But what seems to be the case is that normal is the default mode (which enum --passive uses), not passive mode.

If that is indeed what is happening, is there a way to invoke the old passive mode? Amasss runtime becomes painfully long in normal mode, and many of us have other, more efficient, ways to validate discovered subdomains.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant