You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's interest in adding presence to json0, and I thought I'd make an issue to summarize the need and link to related material.
My desire is to add presence features (cursors, selections) to an app that is using text0 within json0. Others are interested in using the already defined presence implementation of ot-rich-text.
The goal is to define presence in such a way that any json0 leaf node, of any OT type, can have presence, if its OT type implements presence.
My question to you @josephg is, would a PR that implements presence for json0 we welcome here, or would we be better off maintaining a fork for presence? I understand that merging such a PR into json0 may be risky, as mainline ShareDB does not implement the presence spec, which itself is not really "official" quite yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's interest in adding presence to json0, and I thought I'd make an issue to summarize the need and link to related material.
My desire is to add presence features (cursors, selections) to an app that is using text0 within json0. Others are interested in using the already defined presence implementation of ot-rich-text.
The goal is to define presence in such a way that any json0 leaf node, of any OT type, can have presence, if its OT type implements presence.
Related:
ottypes
family.My question to you @josephg is, would a PR that implements presence for json0 we welcome here, or would we be better off maintaining a fork for presence? I understand that merging such a PR into json0 may be risky, as mainline ShareDB does not implement the presence spec, which itself is not really "official" quite yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: