Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add classic topomap NGI 2000 #2

Open
jbelien opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 11 comments
Open

Add classic topomap NGI 2000 #2

jbelien opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 11 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jbelien
Copy link
Member

jbelien commented Feb 25, 2020

From @StevenClays (#4):

Is it possible to add the topomap (2000) to the historical maps?
https://topomapviewer.ngi.be/?l=nl&x=629911.03&y=660643.61&zoom=8&baseLayer=top10r

@jbelien jbelien added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 25, 2020
@jbelien
Copy link
Member Author

jbelien commented Feb 25, 2020

Hello @StevenClays,
The link you sent (NGI Topo10) seems only to be compatible with EPSG:3812 and EPSG:31370.
We need it to be compatible with EPSG:3857 to be added to our historical maps.

I looked on IGN/NGI website and couldn't find it.
If you find it (anywhere), please provide the link.
Thanks !

@StevenClays
Copy link

No possibilities for conversion then? @mstuyts?

@mstuyts
Copy link

mstuyts commented Mar 3, 2020

For the NGI Topo10 layer, I have only found tiles in EPSG:3812. @jbelien, what's the url for tiles in EPSG:31370? I don't think the tiles can be converted to EPSG:3857, because they are prerendered. I looked into using MapProxy to reproject the tiles, because I use that to reproject WMS services. But I haven't found a way to that for tile map layers like the NGI Topo10 one.

I haven't been able to view these tiles outside the NGI TopoMapViewer. I don't know if it's possible in Leaflet to set the CRS of tile layer that's not a WMS source.

All other levels Topo25, Topo50, Topo100, Topo250 and Topo300 are available via WMS: https://wms.ngi.be/inspire/topomaps/service and they have EPSG:3857 and they can be added to Leaflet.

Another related detailed NGI layer is CartoWeb and that's available via WMTS: https://www.ngi.be/cartoweb/1.0.0/WMTSCapabilities.xml that also has EPSG:3857 available.

@StevenClays
Copy link

To explain: topographic maps of the 1990'ies-2000'ies are actually historical maps. So it would be nice to add them. Topo25 & Topo50 would allready be great!

@joostschouppe
Copy link
Member

Added in osmbe/play@97a6be3
Remains to be seen if it actually works :)

@mstuyts
Copy link

mstuyts commented Dec 8, 2021

For some reason, tiles are missing for some areas.
ngi_topo25_tiles

I checked the same service in QGIS, there it shows the same issue, so I guess the wms service has an issue.

@joostschouppe
Copy link
Member

Yes, we noticed as well! I happen to have met someone from NGI at the Trefdag and mentioned it. He contacted the right colleagues
Now it would also be nice to make a smarter implementation that shows different maps at different zoomlevels.

@joostschouppe
Copy link
Member

So... the service is NOT the 2000 version as I understood but rather the most current one! The holes are because there is no update yet! Everything you see is from 2016 and more recent, the empty areas should be filled in by 2022. So we should remove this version; the search for a 2000 version is still on...

@joostschouppe joostschouppe transferred this issue from osmbe/play May 10, 2024
@joostschouppe
Copy link
Member

Any news on this? Any of you found the NGI 2000 link somewhere?

@mstuyts
Copy link

mstuyts commented Jun 17, 2024

I recently talked to someone from NGI about this and the NGI 2000 still is not available as webservice. That NGI person also would like that layer to be available and I told him that would make a lot of people happy.

@StevenClays
Copy link

StevenClays commented Jun 17, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants