-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to prevent complaints about private roads #33
Comments
I've sent this to Thunderforest: Hello, Due to the coronavirus, people starting hiking a lot more here in Belgium (which is very good!). However, one of those GPS-applications popular in Belgium is 'RouteYou', which uses the Thunderforest Neighbourhood-baselayer. However, the private paths are rendered the same as public paths there, adding to the confusion. Would it be possible to apply a different render style for such paths with That would make our lives a lot easier. Kind regards, |
This is an addition by "routeyou" and only visible there. I didn't get any response from thunderforest yet. |
Yeah, I just saw they have two similar layers. I've messaged RouteYou about this. |
Additional idea: put an actual text label on private roads / private paths. We could think this through and then make an issue on https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto |
Maybe we should also make a wikipage with the most common reasons, to copy-past from or to link directly. |
You mean like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property linked above? :) |
Contacted mapy.cz / windy maps, as they also do not render private roads differently |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: