fix: update correct typo

[giautm]

The text for verification code input should be Verification code not Verify code.

Related issue(s)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines.
• I have referenced an issue containing the design document if my change
  introduces a new feature.
• I am following the
  contributing code guidelines.
• I have read the security policy.
• I confirm that this pull request does not address a security
  vulnerability. If this pull request addresses a security vulnerability, I
  confirm that I got the approval (please contact
  [email protected]) from the maintainers to push
  the changes.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature
  works.
• I have added or changed the documentation.

Further Comments

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3281 (6e36e28) into master (8f9bff5) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 6e36e28 differs from pull request most recent head f50c794. Consider uploading reports for the commit f50c794 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3281      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.01%   78.02%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         327      327              
  Lines       21284    21296      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        16604    16616      +12     
  Misses       3447     3447              
  Partials     1233     1233              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cmd/clidoc/main.go	68.34% <100.00%> (+0.29%)	⬆️
selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_recovery.go	70.56% <100.00%> (ø)
selfservice/strategy/code/strategy_verification.go	74.25% <100.00%> (ø)
text/message_node.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[jonas-jonas]

Thank you, great change.

[giautm]

Hello @jonas-jonas, can we merge this soon?

[jonas-jonas]

Actually, looking at this close, we also use this label for recovery, where "Verification code" would not be the right term. But we use one label for both. This would be a breaking change.

WDYT @aeneasr?

[aeneasr]

In that case we indeed need to split the text message and introduce a new message ID. I think that's fine in terms of backwards compatibility

[aeneasr]

@jonas-jonas could you quickly do that?

[jonas-jonas]

@aeneasr done.

@giautm we're using the "Verify Code" label during the MFA (via TOTP) setup as well, so I reverted the renaming and added new nodes for verification & recovery. Thanks again for spotting & fixing this!

[aeneasr]

Awesome, thank you! 🎉 Your contribution makes Ory better :)