Augmented Reality and Augmented 3D

[afomi]

source: #31

Augmented Reality and Augmented 3D

• You want to be able to look at any component in a building or its model and visualize many its aspects such as
  • Building codes
  • Warrantees for the photovoltaic
  • Catalog numbers of the windows
  • Design intents
  • CAD parameters
  • Repair records
  • Kilowatt hours require in December
  • The music currently be streamed to adjacent space

[afomi]

@theo-armour - much like #44 - this is awesome. I'd like to get your thoughts on where this work is best developed and integrated. Spider comes to mind.

I'm happy to move some of these Issues over there.

[theo-armour]

@afomi

graphQL 3D is the tool I want to build to satisfy this item and the previous ones.

It matters little where the data is text, image or 3D data. It all needs ti be acquired, parsed and displayed.

If you know of an existing set of architectural Lego-like components we can play with, assemble and disassemble this would be a great place to start.

[afomi]

GraphQL is a backend query language. I don't see the need for it for a long time. I think a graph database is really what is desired here. In terms of all the features for this issue, I think another repo would be a better place to explore GraphQL. Curious about a use case that justifies the conventional architecture.

…

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 14:39 Theo Armour ***@***.***> wrote: @afomi <https://github.com/afomi> graphQL 3D is the tool I want to build to satisfy this item and the previous ones. It matters little where the data is text, image or 3D data. It all needs ti be acquired, parsed and displayed. If you know of an existing set of architectural Lego-like components we can play with, assemble and disassemble this would be a great place to start. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#45 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJkG6W-c6ciVCB67Xse6QOpVPDjpZeks5uCUGqgaJpZM4U-M0H> .

[theo-armour]

I don't think there is anything currently actionable here for now - even if the original topic is of interest.

Regarding my use of the term 'graphQL': I probably should not be using it. My use of the tern skews widely from the normal use of the term. We need better words to define the title and purpose of the project.