[PRE REVIEW]: Caliscope: GUI Based Multicamera Calibration and Motion Tracking

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mprib (Donald Prible)
Repository: https://github.com/mprib/caliscope
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.5.0
Editor: @mooniean
Reviewers: @Timozen, @davidpagnon
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7fb23eeb517d6d4c8c740c71c75aac82"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7fb23eeb517d6d4c8c740c71c75aac82/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7fb23eeb517d6d4c8c740c71c75aac82/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7fb23eeb517d6d4c8c740c71c75aac82)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mprib. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mprib if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=2.82 s (101.0 files/s, 530268.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                             19              0              0        1260835
XML                            132              0          24029         195128
Python                          91           2762           1891           8776
TOML                            14            113             17            694
Markdown                        20            260              0            585
SVG                              4              0              0            292
YAML                             4             25             12            135
TeX                              1              9              0            123
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           285           3169          25949        1466568
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  2806	mprib
   139	Mac Prible
     3	dependabot[bot]
     2	Ryan Govostes
     1	Jaeseung Han
     1	Rohan

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.7233714 is OK
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109730 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1906.08172 is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y is OK
- 10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The OpenCV Library
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Indie Vicon System Cost and Solo Operator Guide
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Large-Scale Bundle Adjustment in SciPy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: OpenMMLab Pose Estimation Toolbox and Benchmark

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.3389/fspor.2020.00050 may be a valid DOI for title: Evaluation of 3D Markerless Motion Capture Accurac...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 731

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

OmniTrax: A deep learning-driven multi-animal tracking and pose-estimation add-on for Blender
Submitting author: @FabianPlum
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @lucasmiranda42, @sfmig, @rizarae-p
Similarity score: 0.7441

Pose2Sim: An open-source Python package for multiview markerless kinematics
Submitting author: @DavidPagnon
Handling editor: @danasolav (Active)
Reviewers: @lambdaloop, @jonmatthis, @CVHammond
Similarity score: 0.7426

3D reconstruction toolbox for behavior tracked with multiple cameras
Submitting author: @SwathiSheshadri
Handling editor: @cMadan (Retired)
Reviewers: @danasolav, @sreschechtko
Similarity score: 0.7419

MyPTV: A Python Package for 3D Particle Tracking
Submitting author: @ronshnapp
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @leahmendelson, @jgostick
Similarity score: 0.7276

CollatriX: A GUI to collate MorphoMetriX outputs
Submitting author: @cbirdferrer
Handling editor: @KristinaRiemer (Retired)
Reviewers: @evaristor, @katmratliff
Similarity score: 0.7265

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot invite @mooniean as editor

👋 @mooniean are you able to take this one on?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[mooniean]

@crvernon happy to!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mooniean is now the editor

[mooniean]

@mprib 👋 Hi! I'll be editing this paper.

Before we start, are there any reviewers you'd like to suggest?

[mprib]

Thank you for taking this on, @mooniean!

In the past I reviewed a JOSS project (JeFaPaTo) with a similar stack of tools used in Caliscope (python/qt/mediapipe). The lead on that project (timozen) may be well suited to comment on this. Otherwise I have no suggestions.

[mooniean]

Thank you for suggesting, @mprib!

Hi 👋 @Timozen @davidpagnon @MrMallIronmaker - would you be available and interested in reviewing this submission for the Journal of Open Source Software?

#7133

Thanks in advance!

[davidpagnon]

I would be happy to!
However, I probably won't have time to review it before mid-September. Would it work for you?

[Timozen]

@mooniean you can count me in ^^

[mooniean]

Thank you both, @Timozen and @davidpagnon! I'll add you as reviewers :)

Regarding the time, that's ok! I'll start the review and you can do it at your pace!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot add @Timozen as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Timozen added to the reviewers list!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot add @davidpagnon as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@davidpagnon added to the reviewers list!

[mooniean]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7155.