Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SMIRNOFF: definition of vacuum dielectric constant? #17

Open
mrshirts opened this issue Sep 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

SMIRNOFF: definition of vacuum dielectric constant? #17

mrshirts opened this issue Sep 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@mrshirts
Copy link

mrshirts commented Sep 30, 2021

So, AMBER electrostatics assume a slightly old definition of the dielectric constant. Does this need to be specified as well?

See https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10822-016-9977-1 for a discussion of the issue and the differences between different programs.

One can sort of work around it since AMBER .prmtop actually defines the charges as sqrt(vacuum dielectric constant)*charge, so one can alter the charge here to give the same electrostatic energy as in another system.

@mrshirts
Copy link
Author

mrshirts commented Jun 6, 2023

Bumping the questions if the dielectric constant needs to be defined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant