You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking to see if @IAlibay's desired workflow in #1059 could be accomplished by creating two separate interchanges and then combining them to get a single interchange with different charges for isomorphic molecules, and it does not. I think this is surprising - in my head, an interchange associates each atom in the topology with its own parameters, and the fact that parameters are deduplicated is like an optimization. I've already unambiguously identified which atoms should have which charges, and so to lose that information for that optimization is surprising.
Description
I was looking to see if @IAlibay's desired workflow in #1059 could be accomplished by creating two separate interchanges and then combining them to get a single interchange with different charges for isomorphic molecules, and it does not. I think this is surprising - in my head, an interchange associates each atom in the topology with its own parameters, and the fact that parameters are deduplicated is like an optimization. I've already unambiguously identified which atoms should have which charges, and so to lose that information for that optimization is surprising.
Reproduction
Modified version of Irfan's code:
Output
Software versions
Interchange v0.4.0beta2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: