You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
All,
I pulled the latest source from openfisca-core, and ran make test as per the documentation. This fails because of the linter check in the Makefile
[⚙] Delete builds and compiled python files… [⚙] Compile python files to check for syntax errors… [✓] check-syntax-errors:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors… All done! ✨ 🍰 ✨ 244 files would be left unchanged. ./CHANGELOG.md:3725: re-used ==> reused
Once I modify the changelog.md to change re-used to reused the make test goes through. This seems like a small change to raise a pull-request for. I checked for prior issues and I did not find this documented. Can someone please clarify if this is a bug.
[⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-commons:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-data_storage:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-entities:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-experimental:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-indexed_enums:passed ❤
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All,
I pulled the latest source from openfisca-core, and ran
make test
as per the documentation. This fails because of the linter check in the Makefile[⚙] Delete builds and compiled python files… [⚙] Compile python files to check for syntax errors… [✓] check-syntax-errors:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors… All done! ✨ 🍰 ✨ 244 files would be left unchanged. ./CHANGELOG.md:3725: re-used ==> reused
Once I modify the changelog.md to change re-used to reused the
make test
goes through. This seems like a small change to raise a pull-request for. I checked for prior issues and I did not find this documented. Can someone please clarify if this is a bug.[⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-commons:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-data_storage:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-entities:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-experimental:passed ❤ [⚙] Run linters to check for syntax and style errors in the doc… [✓] lint-doc-indexed_enums:passed ❤
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: