You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
runc list shows nothing, but the container still appears in Docker.
$ runc list
ID PID STATUS BUNDLE CREATED OWNER
$ sudo docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
bc73f441bb99 hello-world "/hello" 2 minutes ago Created agitated_franklin
I am not sure whether this is an actual issue or just undefined behavior.
When containers are killed by seccomp after execve, they usually display clear error messages, but in this case they do not—it just hangs.
At the very least, the zombie process should be handled at some point.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I found that runc uses 22 system calls between installing the seccomp filter and calling execve.
This list may not be complete, but at least these system calls must be allowed for the container to start.
If one of them is blocked with SCMP_ACT_KILL, the runc process is killed and stays as a zombie.
Examples:
runc list shows nothing, but the container still appears in Docker.
5.Process tree:
I am not sure whether this is an actual issue or just undefined behavior.
When containers are killed by seccomp after execve, they usually display clear error messages, but in this case they do not—it just hangs.
At the very least, the zombie process should be handled at some point.
versions:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions