For details on Hindsight Experience Replay (HER), please read the paper.
Training an agent is very simple:
python -m baselines.run --alg=her --env=FetchReach-v1 --num_timesteps=5000This will train a DDPG+HER agent on the FetchReach environment.
You should see the success rate go up quickly to 1.0, which means that the agent achieves the
desired goal in 100% of the cases (note how HER can solve it in <5k steps - try doing that with PPO by replacing her with ppo2 :))
The training script logs other diagnostics as well. Policy at the end of the training can be saved using --save_path flag, for instance:
python -m baselines.run --alg=her --env=FetchReach-v1 --num_timesteps=5000 --save_path=~/policies/her/fetchreach5kTo inspect what the agent has learned, use the --play flag:
python -m baselines.run --alg=her --env=FetchReach-v1 --num_timesteps=5000 --play(note --play can be combined with --load_path, which lets one load trained policies, for more results see README.md)
In Plappert et al. (2018), 38 trajectories were generated in parallel (19 MPI processes, each generating computing gradients from 2 trajectories and aggregating). To reproduce that behaviour, use
mpirun -np 19 python -m baselines.run --num_env=2 --alg=her ... This will require a machine with sufficient amount of physical CPU cores. In our experiments, we used Azure's D15v2 instances, which have 20 physical cores. We only scheduled the experiment on 19 of those to leave some head-room on the system.
Using pre-recorded demonstrations to Overcome the exploration problem in HER based Reinforcement learning. For details, please read the paper.
The first step is to generate the demonstration dataset. This can be done in two ways, either by using a VR system to manipulate the arm using physical VR trackers or the simpler way is to write a script to carry out the respective task. Now some tasks can be complex and thus it would be difficult to write a hardcoded script for that task (eg. Fetch Push), but here our focus is on providing an algorithm that helps the agent to learn from demonstrations, and not on the demonstration generation paradigm itself. Thus the data collection part is left to the reader's choice.
We provide a script for the Fetch Pick and Place task, to generate demonstrations for the Pick and Place task execute:
python experiment/data_generation/fetch_data_generation.pyThis outputs data_fetch_random_100.npz file which is our data file.
To launch training with demonstrations (more technically, with behaviour cloning loss as an auxilliary loss), run the following
python -m baselines.run --alg=her --env=FetchPickAndPlace-v1 --num_timesteps=2.5e6 --demo_file=/Path/to/demo_file.npzThis will train a DDPG+HER agent on the FetchPickAndPlace environment by using previously generated demonstration data.
To inspect what the agent has learned, use the --play flag as described above.
The provided configuration is for training an agent with HER without demonstrations, we need to change a few paramters for the HER algorithm to learn through demonstrations, to do that, set:
- bc_loss: 1 - whether or not to use the behavior cloning loss as an auxilliary loss
- q_filter: 1 - whether or not a Q value filter should be used on the Actor outputs
- num_demo: 100 - number of expert demo episodes
- demo_batch_size: 128 - number of samples to be used from the demonstrations buffer, per mpi thread
- prm_loss_weight: 0.001 - Weight corresponding to the primary loss
- aux_loss_weight: 0.0078 - Weight corresponding to the auxilliary loss also called the cloning loss
Apart from these changes the reported results also have the following configurational changes:
- n_cycles: 20 - per epoch
- batch_size: 1024 - per mpi thread, total batch size
- random_eps: 0.1 - percentage of time a random action is taken
- noise_eps: 0.1 - std of gaussian noise added to not-completely-random actions
These parameters can be changed either in experiment/config.py or passed to the command line as --param=value)
Training with demonstrations helps overcome the exploration problem and achieves a faster and better convergence. The following graphs contrast the difference between training with and without demonstration data, We report the mean Q values vs Epoch and the Success Rate vs Epoch:
