Add more alternative representations of surface-partitioning for organics #632
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
@claresinger is |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes... this may require a longer discussion @rxward. In this model of the surface-partitioning we explicitly need to know the "molar volume" of the organic phase in the surface tension calculation. It's similar to how we needed the molar volume previously in the calculation of Köhler curves, but we were able to roll this into |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@claresinger @rxward any news here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Re setting a constant within examples, we can do it as with the sgm_org and delta_min, see here: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The current compressed film framework implemented is one (very simple) option based on Lowe et al (2019) and Ovadnevaite et al (2017). We'd like to 1) rename this option and 2) add another (slightly more complex version) based on Ruehl et al (2016).
I have preliminary python code for Ruehl. This model iteratively solves for the fraction of organic that stays at the surface in the film (vs. dissolves into the bulk phase), and thus adds one more degree of freedom to the representation of the surface-partitioning.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions