Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relax omero metadata #192

Open
giovp opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

relax omero metadata #192

giovp opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@giovp
Copy link
Contributor

giovp commented Apr 27, 2023

Motivation

With this issue, I would like to discuss whether ngff could relax the omero metadata requirements by making "visualization specific" parameters ("window" and "color" ) optional.

As discussed in #155 , there seems to be agreement that the channel name information (e.g. in a microscopy image, the name of the fluorescent markers/antibodies such as "DAPI", "Actin" etc.) should be saved in omero metadata. This information would be stored under "label" according to current spec. This type of information is critical to be stored especially in highly-multiplexed imaging techniques such as CyCIF, Codex, Imaging Mass Cytometry etc.

Users might want to save the channel name information without specifying "color" or "window" information. Currently, it is not possible, as there are two required arguments by the omero specs which are, imho, purely for "visualization" purposes. Users would therefore have to specify "arbitrary" information on aesthetics that is not necessarily useful/actionable.

Potential solution

Make the current required parameters ("color" and "window") as optional. This would enable the use case of only saving channel name information without having to specify the remaining visualization parameters.

@will-moore
Copy link
Member

Sounds good 👍

@giovp
Copy link
Contributor Author

giovp commented Jun 15, 2023

sorry for radio silence @will-moore I will have time to finish this now. Shall I just add this to #191 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants