Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FYI, HumanEval 95 check dict case canonical solution is wrong #52

Closed
PootieT opened this issue Apr 19, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

FYI, HumanEval 95 check dict case canonical solution is wrong #52

PootieT opened this issue Apr 19, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@PootieT
Copy link

PootieT commented Apr 19, 2023

openai/human-eval#22 (comment)
@arjunguha
Copy link
Member

arjunguha commented Apr 19, 2023 •
edited

Oh, there is more than just this one... lookup the degrees/radians problem in MBPP--sorry I forget the number. We actually don't use the canonical solutions at all in MultiPL-E. So, we should be okay about this.

The principle we've been following: we want to fix bugs in MultiPL-E, but preserve bugs in the underlying benchmarks. Hopefully, that will make comparisons easier to do. Let me know if you have other ideas.

@PootieT PootieT closed this as completed Apr 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@arjunguha @PootieT