We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add two first level instructions:
(define_computation <return_type> <name> (<var list>) <computation>) which defines a lambda function that is registered as an extra computation.
(define_computation <return_type> <name> (<var list>) <computation>)
(define_instruction <name> (<var list>) <instruction list>) which defines a sequence that is registered as an extra instruction.
(define_instruction <name> (<var list>) <instruction list>)
Add a warning if those would collide with an existing computation/instruction, but then replace the existing one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it might be better to actually have:
(register_computation [LAMBDA] {name: String})
(register_instruction [SEQUENCE] {name: String})
Sorry, something went wrong.
nsensfel
No branches or pull requests
Add two first level instructions:
(define_computation <return_type> <name> (<var list>) <computation>)
which defines a lambda function that is registered as an extra computation.(define_instruction <name> (<var list>) <instruction list>)
which defines a sequence that is registered as an extra instruction.Add a warning if those would collide with an existing computation/instruction, but then replace the existing one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: