From ced3d670e8dd5e683d0d00154195c07dc5d47a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Constantine Moore Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:30:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update disputes.mdx to clarify squatting dispute process The previous phrasing is extremely confusing; does this policy apply or does it not apply? It sounds as if those documents refer to this one but this one does not apply. Adding an 'except' I believe produces the expected framing --- content/policies/disputes.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/policies/disputes.mdx b/content/policies/disputes.mdx index 9794757120c..b109ac8d4be 100644 --- a/content/policies/disputes.mdx +++ b/content/policies/disputes.mdx @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This process is an excellent way to: - Request a name that you believe is currently misleading or could be confused with a name used by your company or open source project - Request a name related to your company or open source project that cannot be claimed via account recovery -This process does not apply if the package violates our [Terms of Use][open-source-terms], in particular our [Acceptable Use][acceptable-use] and [Acceptable Content][acceptable-content] rules, or our [Code of Conduct][conduct]. Those documents refer to this one to resolve cases of "squatting"; see below. +This process does not apply if the package violates our [Terms of Use][open-source-terms], in particular our [Acceptable Use][acceptable-use] and [Acceptable Content][acceptable-content] rules, or our [Code of Conduct][conduct], *except* to resolve cases of "squatting"; see below. If you see bad behavior or content you believe is unacceptable, refer to the Code of Conduct for guidelines on [reporting violations][violations]. **You are never expected to resolve abusive behavior on your own.** **We are here to help.**