Version
v26.7.0
Platform
Darwin 24.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.6.0 x86_64
macOS 15.7.3 (24G419), Intel Core i5-7500
Subsystem
sea
What steps will reproduce the bug?
On macOS x64, an executable produced by node --build-sea segfaults on launch — including
for a one-line hello world. The same runtime, given the same script through
--experimental-sea-config + postject, produces an executable that runs.
$ echo 'console.log("hello");' > hello.js
# --build-sea
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"a-build-sea","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > a.json
$ node --build-sea a.json
Generated single executable .../bin/node + a.json -> a-build-sea
$ codesign --remove-signature a-build-sea && codesign --sign - a-build-sea
$ ./a-build-sea
Segmentation fault: 11 # exit 139
# the blob path, same node, same script
$ printf '{"main":"hello.js","output":"hello.blob","disableExperimentalSEAWarning":true}' > blob.json
$ node --experimental-sea-config blob.json
Wrote single executable preparation blob to hello.blob
$ cp "$(command -v node)" d-postject && chmod 755 d-postject
$ npx postject d-postject NODE_SEA_BLOB hello.blob \
--sentinel-fuse NODE_SEA_FUSE_fce680ab2cc467b6e072b8b5df1996b2 \
--macho-segment-name NODE_SEA --overwrite
$ codesign --remove-signature d-postject && codesign --sign - d-postject
$ ./d-postject
hello # exit 0
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
Every time, on this host. Not conditional on anything in the config:
| variant |
result |
--build-sea, CommonJS (no mainFormat) |
SIGSEGV |
--build-sea, "mainFormat": "module" |
SIGSEGV |
--build-sea, no codesign step at all |
SIGSEGV |
--experimental-sea-config + postject, same node |
runs |
So it is neither the module format nor the ad-hoc signature.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
node --build-sea should produce a runnable executable — it is documented as the
single-command replacement for the blob + postject procedure, and the procedure it
replaces works on this exact runtime.
What do you see instead?
SIGSEGV before main, while dyld is running the binary's static initializers:
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000001
thread #1, stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x1)
frame #0: 0x000000010000c8f0 a-build-sea`__cxx_global_var_init
dyld invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(...)
dyld mach_o::Header::forEachSection(...)
dyld dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
dyld dyld4::JustInTimeLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const
dyld dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUp(...)
dyld dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()
The faulting address is 0x1, which reads like an initializer entry that was not
relocated rather than a fault inside any particular initializer. (The frame #0 symbol
is a nearest-symbol guess and is probably not meaningful — the appended blob shifts
the symbolication.)
Additional information
Comparing the two outputs, the segment layout is structurally identical but
--build-sea places __DATA_CONST (and everything after it) one page higher than the
postject output does:
$ otool -l a-build-sea | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
segname __TEXT
vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
segname __DATA_CONST
vmaddr 0x00000001061e1000
segname __DATA
vmaddr 0x0000000106394000
segname NODE_SEA
vmaddr 0x000000010640f000
segname __LINKEDIT
vmaddr 0x0000000106410000
$ otool -l d-postject | grep -A4 LC_SEGMENT_64 | grep -E 'segname|vmaddr'
segname __TEXT
vmaddr 0x0000000100000000
segname __DATA_CONST
vmaddr 0x00000001061e0000 # one page lower
segname __DATA
vmaddr 0x0000000106393000
segname NODE_SEA
vmaddr 0x000000010640e000
segname __LINKEDIT
vmaddr 0x000000010640f000
Both binaries carry __init_offsets and report identical Mach-O headers (ncmds 22,
sizeofcmds 2728), so the load commands themselves are not obviously malformed — but
__DATA_CONST moving without the initializer offsets following it would produce exactly
the observed 0x1. I have not confirmed that causally; it is where I would look first.
This is the same class of problem as #61483 (SEA build corrupting .gnu.hash on Linux
arm64) — the build step rewriting the container in a way the loader then rejects — on a
different platform and a different section. #61504 already skips --build-sea tests on
platforms where SEA is flaky; macOS x64 may belong in that set until this is understood.
Node was installed via nvm from the official tarball
(process.release.sourceUrl = https://nodejs.org/download/release/v26.7.0/node-v26.7.0.tar.gz),
so this is an official x64 build, not a self-compiled or Rosetta one.
Practical impact: a project shipping standalone executables cannot rely on --build-sea
on macOS x64 and has to keep the postject fallback alive, detecting the failure by
running the produced binary before trusting it.
Version
v26.7.0
Platform
Subsystem
sea
What steps will reproduce the bug?
On macOS x64, an executable produced by
node --build-seasegfaults on launch — includingfor a one-line hello world. The same runtime, given the same script through
--experimental-sea-config+postject, produces an executable that runs.How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
Every time, on this host. Not conditional on anything in the config:
--build-sea, CommonJS (nomainFormat)--build-sea,"mainFormat": "module"--build-sea, nocodesignstep at all--experimental-sea-config+postject, same nodeSo it is neither the module format nor the ad-hoc signature.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
node --build-seashould produce a runnable executable — it is documented as thesingle-command replacement for the blob +
postjectprocedure, and the procedure itreplaces works on this exact runtime.
What do you see instead?
SIGSEGVbeforemain, while dyld is running the binary's static initializers:The faulting address is
0x1, which reads like an initializer entry that was notrelocated rather than a fault inside any particular initializer. (The frame #0 symbol
is a nearest-symbol guess and is probably not meaningful — the appended blob shifts
the symbolication.)
Additional information
Comparing the two outputs, the segment layout is structurally identical but
--build-seaplaces__DATA_CONST(and everything after it) one page higher than thepostjectoutput does:Both binaries carry
__init_offsetsand report identical Mach-O headers (ncmds 22,sizeofcmds 2728), so the load commands themselves are not obviously malformed — but__DATA_CONSTmoving without the initializer offsets following it would produce exactlythe observed
0x1. I have not confirmed that causally; it is where I would look first.This is the same class of problem as #61483 (SEA build corrupting
.gnu.hashon Linuxarm64) — the build step rewriting the container in a way the loader then rejects — on a
different platform and a different section. #61504 already skips
--build-seatests onplatforms where SEA is flaky; macOS x64 may belong in that set until this is understood.
Node was installed via nvm from the official tarball
(
process.release.sourceUrl=https://nodejs.org/download/release/v26.7.0/node-v26.7.0.tar.gz),so this is an official x64 build, not a self-compiled or Rosetta one.
Practical impact: a project shipping standalone executables cannot rely on
--build-seaon macOS x64 and has to keep the
postjectfallback alive, detecting the failure byrunning the produced binary before trusting it.