You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a benchmark for cowboy WebScokets with and without compression? I'm trying to understand the memory, cpu and time overhead with compression and if it's stable and scalable for 1K connections.
Safari 15 had an issue with WebSocket connection when deflate is on. Maybe only when frames are fragmented. Cowboy never send fragmented packets, right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Will it be better to replace zlib:inflate/2 with zlib:safeinflate/2
to prevent zlib-bomb as mentioned here?
https://github.com/ninenines/cowlib/blob/master/src/cow_ws.erl#L546 and few other places.
Is there a benchmark for cowboy WebScokets with and without compression? I'm trying to understand the memory, cpu and time overhead with compression and if it's stable and scalable for 1K connections.
Safari 15 had an issue with WebSocket connection when deflate is on. Maybe only when frames are fragmented. Cowboy never send fragmented packets, right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: