Compare with official CRM in RDF

[nichtich]

See https://gitlab.isl.ics.forth.gr/cidoc-crm/cidoc_crm_rdf/-/tree/master/7.1.3 for current CRM ontology.

It neither defines the following CRM classes as RDF classes:

• E59 Primitive Value
• E60 Number
• E61 Time Primitive
• E62 String
• E94 Space Primitive
• E95 Spacetime Primitive

It includes E52 Time-Span like this application profile but the latter recommends to avoid use of E52. This can be discussed.

It includes E32_Authority_Document and E55 Type while this application profile uses skos:ConceptScheme and skos:Concept.

It includes E58_Measurement_Unit. This class should be avoided but roughly the same is stated in CRM.

Handling of intervals is described well and should be included in this application profile.

[nichtich]

We could fetch https://gitlab.isl.ics.forth.gr/cidoc-crm/cidoc_crm_rdf/-/blob/master/7.1.3/CIDOC_CRM_v7.1.3.rdf and remove

• crm:E32_Authority_Document - use skos:ConceptScheme instead
• crm:P71_lists - use inverse skos:inScheme instead
• crm:P71i_is_listed_in - use skos:inScheme instead
• crm:E55_Type - use skos:Concept, rdfs:Class or owl:Class instead
• crm:P127_has_broader_term - use skos:broader instead
• crm:P127i_has_narrower_term - use skos:narrower instead
• crm:P168_place_is_defined_by - use geo:hasGeometry instead