Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: AppImage always opens the browser at start up #7367

Closed
5 of 8 tasks
NCC1701M opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
5 of 8 tasks

[Bug]: AppImage always opens the browser at start up #7367

NCC1701M opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@NCC1701M
Copy link

⚠️ Before submitting, please verify the following: ⚠️

Bug description

Every time the Linux AppImage client is started - whether at computer startup, when I log my user off and on again, or simply when I restart the application - the client opens the browser and expects me to authorize the application.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Install the AppImage by using the AppImageLauncher
  2. Start the client
  3. Authorize the client in the browser
  4. Restart the client

Expected behavior

The authorization should be valid longer than until the next start of the application

Which files are affected by this bug

None

Operating system

Linux

Which version of the operating system you are running.

Linux Mint 22 Cinnamon

Package

Official Linux AppImage

Nextcloud Server version

30.0.0

Nextcloud Desktop Client version

3.14.1

Is this bug present after an update or on a fresh install?

Updated from a minor version (ex. 3.4.2 to 3.4.4)

Are you using the Nextcloud Server Encryption module?

Encryption is Disabled

Are you using an external user-backend?

  • Default internal user-backend
  • LDAP/ Active Directory
  • SSO - SAML
  • Other

Nextcloud Server logs

No response

Additional info

No response

@VanackSabbadium
Copy link

Same for me.
Latest working version is 3.13.4 RC3, and i'm using it since from 3.14 this bug happens.

@camilasan
Copy link
Member

isn't this issue the same as #7231?

@VanackSabbadium
Copy link

Yes, it is.

@camilasan
Copy link
Member

Yes, it is.

Then let's continue the conversation in #7231. Thanks for confirming it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants