Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Poll Proposal - changes to smart contract #78

Open
crypto-credit opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Poll Proposal - changes to smart contract #78

crypto-credit opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
C-discussion Category: Discussion, leading to research or enhancement C-Enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. P-Low Priority: Low

Comments

@crypto-credit
Copy link

I have just run a Poll on our DAO https://app.astrodao.com/dao/swine-dao.sputnik-dao.near/proposals/swine-dao.sputnik-dao.near-26

When the majority (51%) of the council members had voted the Poll was automatically approved. This means that the other council members did not have the opportunity to vote.
I would like to suggest that this is changed to enable a Vote (Poll) proposals to stay open after the threshold of votes are cast.

This should only apply to this one category of Poll proposals and not affect the general Voting Policy set for the DAO

@ctindogaru
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you need this just for the Poll type of proposals?

Also, what's the motivation behind this? Is it just to get everyone's opinion on a certain topic and not limit it to only half of the group?

@crypto-credit
Copy link
Author

I would suggest this as the default functionality for Poll proposals. Other proposals (like payouts) should keep to the standard Voting Policy (51% to approve).

The reason for this request is primarily to encourage participation by ALL council members in the decision making process. To show that everyone's opinion counts.

IMO it would also provide an additional tool for internal governance of the DAO. Using this type of Poll proposal provides a transparent on chain way for council members to discuss DAO business

@TrevorJTClarke TrevorJTClarke added C-discussion Category: Discussion, leading to research or enhancement C-Enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. P-Low Priority: Low labels Feb 8, 2022
@TrevorJTClarke
Copy link
Contributor

@crypto-credit I suspect the real issue here revolves around the threshold closure preference, meaning if we had a way to allow poll accepting votes until the expiration of the proposal, it could solve your problem.
This would then require a finalization method on the proposal however, before the poll would be "complete". Is this the intended/desired outcome you were thinking?
If so, will need to think further on best way to consider, as there is another effort in PR #102 that might be a more efficient way to achieve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-discussion Category: Discussion, leading to research or enhancement C-Enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. P-Low Priority: Low
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants