Skip to content

modkit dmr results- question #591

@khushimamgain

Description

@khushimamgain

Dear authors,
Thankyou for making ModKit, it is a really nice tool. I have some questions on the interpretation of the results I got from the DMR pair between two conditions after m6A profiling and I would be grateful to you if you could explain to me what it means.

What I did:

  • Dorado basecalling for m6a and pseudouridine, alignment to transcriptome, followed by modkit pileup to get bed methylfiles
  • modkit dmr pair between two conditions with the following command to get results:
    dmr_result=differential_tx_CT20vsPerKO20.bed modkit dmr pair \ -a ${A1} \ -a ${A2} \ -a ${A3} \ -b ${B1} \ -b ${B2} \ -b ${B3} \ --header \ --min-valid-coverage 20 \ -o "$out_dir"/dmr/${dmr_result} \ --base A \ --ref ${ref} \ --base T \ --threads ${threads} \ --log-filepath dmr_2.log
  • Filter based on effect size and balanced p-value.

issue:

One of the positions is different significantly on the transcript, ENSMUST00000174287, showing its percentage going from 80% in A to 38% in B, meaning a decreased modification in condition B.

Image

However, in the input pileup bed files (condition A: KM4,5,6, condition B: KM7,8,9), the percentage values is A are, 80, 20, 20 and in B are 66, 40, 38. Based on just the % values, it seems that there only one sample in A has higher % than in B
Image

Question

I am confused about how the differential marks are calculated and if one sample can cause so much effect. If that is the case, could you please tell me how I can interpret this?
Any input from you would be really helpful, as I might have also misunderstood the results.

Thankyou in advance.
Khushi.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    troubleshootingworkflow and data preparation questions

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions