Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to include locus_tag or gene_id in gbf? #36

Open
k6logc opened this issue Sep 3, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

How to include locus_tag or gene_id in gbf? #36

k6logc opened this issue Sep 3, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@k6logc
Copy link

k6logc commented Sep 3, 2022

Hi Mike,
Thank you for Cenote-Taker2! It is doing a great job with our datasets.
Question: There is no locus_tag or gene_id in our output gbf files - is there an option to include this? Or an easy way to add it?
Best wishes,
Kathryn

@mtisza1
Copy link
Owner

mtisza1 commented Sep 7, 2022

Hi Kathryn,

I looked into this, and, while it would be possible to add this information, it would be quite a bit of effort on my end and probably introduce bugs somewhere, which I would also have to fix. So I'm honestly a bit hesitant to do it.

Perhaps if you let me know why you need these pieces of information (as opposed to the protein_id), I could do something a little simpler on my end to help you achieve your goals.

Mike

@k6logc
Copy link
Author

k6logc commented Sep 13, 2022

Hi Mike,
Thank you very much for looking into this and even offering to help find a work around. It is not essential for what we are doing but in general it is handy when the unique gene identifier (e.g. locus_tag or gene_id) is there as it makes it easier to use the gbf as the sole source of info from which other formats (incl. e.g. prots fastas with unique ids) can be extracted. Would be great if this could just be on your list if you ever do an update to Cenote-Taker2.
Best,
Kathryn

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants