Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update recommended hardware requirements #85

Open
Gwalior-84 opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Update recommended hardware requirements #85

Gwalior-84 opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@Gwalior-84
Copy link

omSupply Recommended Requirements (https://docs.msupply.foundation/docs/introduction/requirements/) is incorrect. Please fix it, bringing it into alignment with our Legacy mSupply requirements page (https://docs.msupply.org.nz/setting_up_msupply:requirements#windows_and_mac_hardware_requirements)?

@Gwalior-84 Gwalior-84 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 16, 2024
@craigdrown
Copy link
Contributor

Ummm, @Gwalior-84 I don’t agree that the “technical minimum” for a server is 32Gb RAM, which you’ve put in the OG docs.

@Gwalior-84
Copy link
Author

Ummm, @Gwalior-84 I don’t agree that the “technical minimum” for a server is 32Gb RAM, which you’ve put in the OG docs.

We have had 32GB RAM central servers hosting a synced system fail (chronically under-perform) due to having insufficient RAM. What do you suggest the technical minimum should be?

@mark-prins
Copy link
Contributor

omSupply and mSupply are different pieces of software and while I took the original hardware requirements from the OG specs, we are still exploring the needs of omSupply running as a server. I'd also argue that your environment is something of a stretch goal rather than a technical minimum!

Perhaps a 16GB recommended for a server though?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants