Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy with or without neurological features #7951

Open
poppies700 opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
New term request user request A request from an external user

Comments

@poppies700
Copy link

Preferred gene-related syndrome label
RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy with or without neurological features

Synonyms
RTN4IP1-Optic atrophy 10 with or without ataxia, impaired intellectual development and seizures

Parent term (use OLS, or your favorite ontology browser)
MONDO:0003608

Definition
Please write the definition in the format: Any [parent class] in which the cause of the disease is a mutation in the [gene name] gene. For example: Any congenital myopathy in which the cause of the disease is a mutation in the TPM3 gene.

Isolated optic atrophy or optic atrophy with neurological involvement including intellectual disability, ataxia, seizures.

**Definition source (Please give PubMed ID, if applicable, in format PMID:#######)
PMID: 29181510; PMID: 27150940 PMID: 28638143

Children terms (if applicable) Should any existing terms be re-classified as children underneath this new proposed term?

Your nano-attribution (ORCID) or URL for a working group
If you don't have an ORCID, you can sign up for one here

@sagehrke sagehrke added the user request A request from an external user label Jul 25, 2024
@yshwetar
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @poppies700,

Thank you for your submission to MONDO! After reviewing your submission, we were curious if we could create a parent term 'RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy', with two children terms 'RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy with neurological features' and 'RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy without neurological features'. We prefer this arrangement over a singular term having 'with or without' because if a patient is placed under a category, we want it to be true 100% of the time. So in this case, a patient would be categorized entirely as either having, or not having neurological manifestations. And if it is unclear, then the patient can just be categorized broadly as 'RTN4IP1-related optic atrophy'.

Let us know what you think and if there's anything you would like us to clarify. Thanks!

Regards,

Yousif

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
New term request user request A request from an external user
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants