Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QST] Why does awq write its own int3/int4 GEMM kernels instead of using CUTLASS #235

Open
SimpleTheoryOfTypes opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@SimpleTheoryOfTypes
Copy link

SimpleTheoryOfTypes commented Nov 11, 2024

Just curious about AWQ's decision to implement its own custom int3/int4 GEMM kernels rather than using NVIDIA's CUTLASS library (such as using int4 CUTLASS GEMMs developed by FasterTransformer). Was this choice driven by performance limitations with CUTLASS, or did they perhaps encounter compatibility issues? Thanks in advance for the insights!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant