KVM? #2

RusJJ · 2019-11-03T18:55:06Z

Hi there! Any luck in KVM realisation?

[ Upstream commit db735fc4036bbe1fbe606819b5f0ff26cc76cdff ] Turning on CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG results in the following error: [ 12.078665] msm ae00000.mdss: DMA-API: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=3526656] [max=65536] [ 12.089870] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 334 at /mnt/host/source/src/third_party/kernel/v4.19/kernel/dma/debug.c:1301 debug_dma_map_sg+0x1dc/0x318 [ 12.102655] Modules linked in: joydev [ 12.106442] CPU: 6 PID: 334 Comm: frecon Not tainted 4.19.0 #2 [ 12.112450] Hardware name: Google Cheza (rev3+) (DT) [ 12.117566] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [ 12.122506] pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x1dc/0x318 [ 12.126995] lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x1dc/0x318 [ 12.131487] sp : ffffff800cc3ba80 [ 12.134913] x29: ffffff800cc3ba80 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 12.140395] x27: 0000000000000004 x26: 0000000000000004 [ 12.145868] x25: ffffff8008e55b18 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 12.151337] x23: 00000000ffffffff x22: ffffff800921c000 [ 12.156809] x21: ffffffc0fa75b080 x20: ffffffc0f7195090 [ 12.162280] x19: ffffffc0f1c53280 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 12.167749] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 12.173218] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0720072007200720 [ 12.178689] x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720 [ 12.184161] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0720072007200720 [ 12.189641] x9 : ffffffc0f1fc6b60 x8 : 0000000000000000 [ 12.195110] x7 : ffffff8008132ce0 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 12.200585] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffffff8008134734 [ 12.206058] x3 : ffffff800cc3b830 x2 : ffffffc0f1fc6240 [ 12.211532] x1 : 25045a74f48a7400 x0 : 25045a74f48a7400 [ 12.217006] Call trace: [ 12.219535] debug_dma_map_sg+0x1dc/0x318 [ 12.223671] get_pages+0x19c/0x20c [ 12.227177] msm_gem_fault+0x64/0xfc [ 12.230874] __do_fault+0x3c/0x140 [ 12.234383] __handle_mm_fault+0x70c/0xdb8 [ 12.238603] handle_mm_fault+0xac/0xc4 [ 12.242473] do_page_fault+0x1bc/0x3d4 [ 12.246342] do_translation_fault+0x54/0x88 [ 12.250652] do_mem_abort+0x60/0xf0 [ 12.254250] el0_da+0x20/0x24 [ 12.257317] irq event stamp: 67260 [ 12.260828] hardirqs last enabled at (67259): [<ffffff8008132d0c>] console_unlock+0x214/0x608 [ 12.269693] hardirqs last disabled at (67260): [<ffffff8008080e0c>] do_debug_exception+0x5c/0x178 [ 12.278820] softirqs last enabled at (67256): [<ffffff8008081664>] __do_softirq+0x4d4/0x520 [ 12.287510] softirqs last disabled at (67249): [<ffffff80080be574>] irq_exit+0xa8/0x100 [ 12.295742] ---[ end trace e63cfc40c313ffab ]--- The root of the problem is that the default segment size for sgt is (UINT_MAX & PAGE_MASK), and the default segment size for device dma is 64K. As such, if you compare the 2, you would deduce that the sg segment will overflow the device's capacity. In reality, the hardware can accommodate the larger sg segments, it's just not initializing its max segment properly. This patch initializes the max segment size for the mdss device, which gets rid of that pesky warning. Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121111813.REPOST.1.I92c66a35fb13f368095b05287bdabdbe88ca6922@changeid Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit e8c75a30a23c6ba63f4ef6895cbf41fd42f21aa2 upstream. sel_lock cannot nest in the console lock. Thanks to syzkaller, the kernel states firmly: > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 5.6.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > syz-executor.4/20336 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff8880a2e952a0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++}, at: tty_unthrottle+0x22/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c:136 > > but task is already holding lock: > ffffffff89462e70 (sel_lock){+.+.}, at: paste_selection+0x118/0x470 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:374 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #2 (sel_lock){+.+.}: > mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118 > set_selection_kernel+0x3b8/0x18a0 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:217 > set_selection_user+0x63/0x80 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:181 > tioclinux+0x103/0x530 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3050 > vt_ioctl+0x3f1/0x3a30 drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:364 This is ioctl(TIOCL_SETSEL). Locks held on the path: console_lock -> sel_lock > -> #1 (console_lock){+.+.}: > console_lock+0x46/0x70 kernel/printk/printk.c:2289 > con_flush_chars+0x50/0x650 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3223 > n_tty_write+0xeae/0x1200 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2350 > do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:962 [inline] > tty_write+0x5a1/0x950 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1046 This is write(). Locks held on the path: termios_rwsem -> console_lock > -> #0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++}: > down_write+0x57/0x140 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1534 > tty_unthrottle+0x22/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c:136 > mkiss_receive_buf+0x12aa/0x1340 drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c:902 > tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x12f/0x170 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:465 > paste_selection+0x346/0x470 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:389 > tioclinux+0x121/0x530 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3055 > vt_ioctl+0x3f1/0x3a30 drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:364 This is ioctl(TIOCL_PASTESEL). Locks held on the path: sel_lock -> termios_rwsem > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > &tty->termios_rwsem --> console_lock --> sel_lock Clearly. From the above, we have: console_lock -> sel_lock sel_lock -> termios_rwsem termios_rwsem -> console_lock Fix this by reversing the console_lock -> sel_lock dependency in ioctl(TIOCL_SETSEL). First, lock sel_lock, then console_lock. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 07e6124a1a46 ("vt: selection, close sel_buffer race") Cc: stable <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 6c5d911249290f41f7b50b43344a7520605b1acb ] journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, LTP: starting fsync04 /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2] write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70: __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2] __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2] (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034 kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2] kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2] jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155 jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2] __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4] ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe 5 locks held by fsync04/25724: #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260 #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4] #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4] #4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2] irq event stamp: 1407125 hardirqs last enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE(). Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 28936b62e71e41600bab319f262ea9f9b1027629 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f0cc2cd70164efe8f75c5d99560f0f69969c72e4 ] During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue still running, that can lead to at least two bad things: 1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just after the fs roots were freed; 2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread. A stack trace example of the crash: [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982! [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2 (...) [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170 (...) [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001 [79011.709270] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [79011.710699] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [79011.715448] Call Trace: [79011.715925] record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs] [79011.716819] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs] [79011.717925] start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [79011.718829] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs] [79011.719915] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [79011.720773] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [79011.721497] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [79011.722153] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [79011.722901] kthread+0x103/0x140 [79011.723481] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [79011.724379] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash during ummount of the filesystem: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_punch_hole() btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() btrfs_balance_delayed_items() --> sees fs_info->delayed_root->items with value 200, which is greater than BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128) and smaller than BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() --> queues a job for fs_info->delayed_workers to run btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() --> job queued by CPU 1 --> starts picking and running delayed nodes from the prepare_list list close_ctree() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() btrfs_commit_super() btrfs_join_transaction() --> gets transaction N btrfs_commit_transaction(N) --> set transaction state to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node() --> picks delayed node X through the prepared_list list btrfs_run_delayed_items() btrfs_first_delayed_node() --> also picks delayed node X but through the node_list list __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() --> runs all delayed items from this node and drops the node's item count to 0 through call to btrfs_release_delayed_inode() --> finishes running any remaining delayed nodes --> finishes transaction commit --> stops cleaner and transaction threads btrfs_free_fs_roots() --> frees all roots and removes them from the radix tree fs_info->fs_roots_radix btrfs_join_transaction() start_transaction() btrfs_record_root_in_trans() record_root_in_trans() radix_tree_tag_set() --> crashes because the root is not in the radix tree anymore If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore. When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all its items first. We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING. Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed node already. Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the worker. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 056ad39ee9253873522f6469c3364964a322912b upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 76e752701a8af4404bbd9c45723f7cbd6e4a251e ] Some servers seem to accept connections while booting but never send the SMBNegotiate response neither close the connection, causing all processes accessing the share hang on uninterruptible sleep state. This happens when the cifs_demultiplex_thread detects the server is unresponsive so releases the socket and start trying to reconnect. At some point, the faulty server will accept the socket and the TCP status will be set to NeedNegotiate. The first issued command accessing the share will start the negotiation (pid 5828 below), but the response will never arrive so other commands will be blocked waiting on the mutex (pid 55352). This patch checks for unresponsive servers also on the negotiate stage releasing the socket and reconnecting if the response is not received and checking again the tcp state when the mutex is acquired. PID: 55352 TASK: ffff880fd6cc02c0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "ls" #0 [ffff880fd9add9f0] schedule at ffffffff81467eb9 #1 [ffff880fd9addb38] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffff81468fe0 #2 [ffff880fd9addba8] mutex_lock at ffffffff81468b1a #3 [ffff880fd9addbc0] cifs_reconnect_tcon at ffffffffa042f905 [cifs] #4 [ffff880fd9addc60] smb_init at ffffffffa042faeb [cifs] #5 [ffff880fd9addca0] CIFSSMBQPathInfo at ffffffffa04360b5 [cifs] .... Which is waiting a mutex owned by: PID: 5828 TASK: ffff880fcc55e400 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "xxxx" #0 [ffff880fbfdc19b8] schedule at ffffffff81467eb9 #1 [ffff880fbfdc1b00] wait_for_response at ffffffffa044f96d [cifs] #2 [ffff880fbfdc1b60] SendReceive at ffffffffa04505ce [cifs] #3 [ffff880fbfdc1bb0] CIFSSMBNegotiate at ffffffffa0438d79 [cifs] #4 [ffff880fbfdc1c50] cifs_negotiate_protocol at ffffffffa043b383 [cifs] #5 [ffff880fbfdc1c80] cifs_reconnect_tcon at ffffffffa042f911 [cifs] #6 [ffff880fbfdc1d20] smb_init at ffffffffa042faeb [cifs] #7 [ffff880fbfdc1d60] CIFSSMBQFSInfo at ffffffffa0434eb0 [cifs] .... Signed-off-by: Samuel Cabrero <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Aurélien Aptel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…ong traces [ Upstream commit 106d45f350c7cac876844dc685845cba4ffdb70b ] When tracing instances where we open and close WKA ports, we also pass the request-ID of the respective FSF command. But after successfully sending the FSF command we must not use the request-object anymore, as this might result in an use-after-free (see "zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing seqno errors" ). To fix this add a new variable that caches the request-ID before sending the request. This won't change during the hand-off to the FCP channel, and so it's safe to trace this cached request-ID later, instead of using the request object. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <[email protected]> Fixes: d27a7cb ("zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port") Cc: <[email protected]> #2.6.38+ Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f6766ff6afff70e2aaf39e1511e16d471de7c3ae ] We need to check mddev->del_work before flush workqueu since the purpose of flush is to ensure the previous md is disappeared. Otherwise the similar deadlock appeared if LOCKDEP is enabled, it is due to md_open holds the bdev->bd_mutex before flush workqueue. kernel: [ 154.522645] ====================================================== kernel: [ 154.522647] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected kernel: [ 154.522650] 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 Tainted: G O kernel: [ 154.522651] ------------------------------------------------------ kernel: [ 154.522653] mdadm/2482 is trying to acquire lock: kernel: [ 154.522655] ffff888078529128 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522673] kernel: [ 154.522673] but task is already holding lock: kernel: [ 154.522675] ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522691] kernel: [ 154.522691] which lock already depends on the new lock. kernel: [ 154.522691] kernel: [ 154.522694] kernel: [ 154.522694] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: kernel: [ 154.522696] kernel: [ 154.522696] -> #4 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522704] __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950 kernel: [ 154.522706] __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522708] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522709] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x2f/0x40 kernel: [ 154.522716] lock_rdev+0x3d/0x90 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522719] md_import_device+0xd6/0x1b0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522723] new_dev_store+0x15e/0x210 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522728] md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522732] kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522735] vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522737] ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0 kernel: [ 154.522745] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522748] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522749] kernel: [ 154.522749] -> #3 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522752] __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950 kernel: [ 154.522756] new_dev_store+0xc9/0x210 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522759] md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522761] kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522763] vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522765] ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0 kernel: [ 154.522767] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522769] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522770] kernel: [ 154.522770] -> #2 (kn->count#253){++++}: kernel: [ 154.522775] __kernfs_remove+0x253/0x2c0 kernel: [ 154.522778] kernfs_remove+0x1f/0x30 kernel: [ 154.522780] kobject_del+0x28/0x60 kernel: [ 154.522783] mddev_delayed_delete+0x24/0x30 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522786] process_one_work+0x2a7/0x5f0 kernel: [ 154.522788] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 kernel: [ 154.522793] kthread+0x117/0x130 kernel: [ 154.522795] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 kernel: [ 154.522796] kernel: [ 154.522796] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&mddev->del_work)){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522800] process_one_work+0x27e/0x5f0 kernel: [ 154.522802] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 kernel: [ 154.522804] kthread+0x117/0x130 kernel: [ 154.522806] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 kernel: [ 154.522807] kernel: [ 154.522807] -> #0 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522813] __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522816] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522818] flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522821] md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522823] __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522825] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522828] do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380 kernel: [ 154.522831] path_openat+0x567/0xcc0 kernel: [ 154.522834] do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 kernel: [ 154.522836] do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522838] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 kernel: [ 154.522840] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522842] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522844] kernel: [ 154.522844] other info that might help us debug this: kernel: [ 154.522844] kernel: [ 154.522846] Chain exists of: kernel: [ 154.522846] (wq_completion)md_misc --> &mddev->reconfig_mutex --> &bdev->bd_mutex kernel: [ 154.522846] kernel: [ 154.522850] Possible unsafe locking scenario: kernel: [ 154.522850] kernel: [ 154.522852] CPU0 CPU1 kernel: [ 154.522853] ---- ---- kernel: [ 154.522854] lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522856] lock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522858] lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522860] lock((wq_completion)md_misc); kernel: [ 154.522861] kernel: [ 154.522861] *** DEADLOCK *** kernel: [ 154.522861] kernel: [ 154.522864] 1 lock held by mdadm/2482: kernel: [ 154.522865] #0: ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522868] kernel: [ 154.522868] stack backtrace: kernel: [ 154.522873] CPU: 1 PID: 2482 Comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 kernel: [ 154.522875] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 kernel: [ 154.522878] Call Trace: kernel: [ 154.522881] dump_stack+0x8f/0xcb kernel: [ 154.522884] check_noncircular+0x194/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522888] ? __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522890] __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522893] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522895] ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522898] flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522900] ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522905] ? md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522908] md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522910] __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522912] ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0 kernel: [ 154.522914] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522916] ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0 kernel: [ 154.522918] do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380 kernel: [ 154.522921] path_openat+0x567/0xcc0 kernel: [ 154.522923] ? __lock_acquire+0x380/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522926] do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 kernel: [ 154.522929] ? __alloc_fd+0xe5/0x1f0 kernel: [ 154.522935] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x28c/0x630 kernel: [ 154.522939] ? do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522941] do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522944] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 kernel: [ 154.522946] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522948] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522951] RIP: 0033:0x7f98d279d9ae And md_alloc also flushed the same workqueue, but the thing is different here. Because all the paths call md_alloc don't hold bdev->bd_mutex, and the flush is necessary to avoid race condition, so leave it as it is. Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2d3a8e2deddea6c89961c422ec0c5b851e648c14 ] In blkdev_get() we call __blkdev_get() to do some internal jobs and if there is some errors in __blkdev_get(), the bdput() is called which means we have released the refcount of the bdev (actually the refcount of the bdev inode). This means we cannot access bdev after that point. But acctually bdev is still accessed in blkdev_get() after calling __blkdev_get(). This results in use-after-free if the refcount is the last one we released in __blkdev_get(). Let's take a look at the following scenerio: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blkdev_open blkdev_open Remove disk bd_acquire blkdev_get __blkdev_get del_gendisk bdev_unhash_inode bd_acquire bdev_get_gendisk bd_forget failed because of unhashed bdput bdput (the last one) bdev_evict_inode access bdev => use after free [ 459.350216] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.351190] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88806c815a80 by task syz-executor.0/20132 [ 459.352347] [ 459.352594] CPU: 0 PID: 20132 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #2 [ 459.353628] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 459.354947] Call Trace: [ 459.355337] dump_stack+0x111/0x19e [ 459.355879] ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.356523] print_address_description+0x60/0x223 [ 459.357248] ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.357887] kasan_report.cold+0xae/0x2d8 [ 459.358503] __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.359120] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [ 459.359784] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x37b/0x580 [ 459.360465] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [ 459.361123] ? finish_task_switch+0x125/0x600 [ 459.361812] ? finish_task_switch+0xee/0x600 [ 459.362471] ? mark_held_locks+0xf0/0xf0 [ 459.363108] ? __schedule+0x96f/0x21d0 [ 459.363716] lock_acquire+0x111/0x320 [ 459.364285] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.364846] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.365390] __mutex_lock+0xf9/0x12a0 [ 459.365948] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.366493] ? bdev_evict_inode+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 459.367130] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.367678] ? destroy_inode+0xbc/0x110 [ 459.368261] ? mutex_trylock+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 459.368867] ? __blkdev_get+0x3e6/0x1280 [ 459.369463] ? bdev_disk_changed+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 459.370114] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.370656] blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.371178] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 459.371774] ? __blkdev_get+0x1280/0x1280 [ 459.372383] ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680 [ 459.373002] ? lock_acquire+0x111/0x320 [ 459.373587] ? bd_acquire+0x21/0x2c0 [ 459.374134] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250 [ 459.374780] blkdev_open+0x202/0x290 [ 459.375325] do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050 [ 459.375924] ? blkdev_get_by_dev+0x70/0x70 [ 459.376543] ? __x64_sys_fchdir+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 459.377192] ? inode_permission+0xbe/0x3a0 [ 459.377818] path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50 [ 459.378392] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280 [ 459.379016] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.379802] ? path_lookupat.isra.0+0x900/0x900 [ 459.380489] ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140 [ 459.381093] do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 [ 459.381654] ? may_open_dev+0xf0/0xf0 [ 459.382214] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 459.382816] ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680 [ 459.383425] ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140 [ 459.384024] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250 [ 459.384668] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 459.385280] ? __alloc_fd+0x448/0x560 [ 459.385841] do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500 [ 459.386386] ? filp_open+0x70/0x70 [ 459.386911] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 459.387610] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x55/0x1c0 [ 459.388342] ? do_syscall_64+0x1a/0x520 [ 459.388930] do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520 [ 459.389490] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.390248] RIP: 0033:0x416211 [ 459.390720] Code: 75 14 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 04 19 00 00 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 0a fa ff ff 48 89 04 24 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 8b 3c 24 48 89 c2 e8 53 fa ff ff 48 89 d0 48 83 c4 08 48 3d 01 [ 459.393483] RSP: 002b:00007fe45dfe9a60 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002 [ 459.394610] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe45dfea6d4 RCX: 0000000000416211 [ 459.395678] RDX: 00007fe45dfe9b0a RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fe45dfe9b00 [ 459.396758] RBP: 000000000076bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000a [ 459.397930] R10: 0000000000000075 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00000000ffffffff [ 459.399022] R13: 0000000000000bd9 R14: 00000000004cdb80 R15: 000000000076bf2c [ 459.400168] [ 459.400430] Allocated by task 20132: [ 459.401038] kasan_kmalloc+0xbf/0xe0 [ 459.401652] kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280 [ 459.402330] bdev_alloc_inode+0x18/0x40 [ 459.402970] alloc_inode+0x5f/0x180 [ 459.403510] iget5_locked+0x57/0xd0 [ 459.404095] bdget+0x94/0x4e0 [ 459.404607] bd_acquire+0xfa/0x2c0 [ 459.405113] blkdev_open+0x110/0x290 [ 459.405702] do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050 [ 459.406340] path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50 [ 459.406926] do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 [ 459.407471] do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500 [ 459.408010] do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520 [ 459.408572] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.409415] [ 459.409679] Freed by task 1262: [ 459.410212] __kasan_slab_free+0x129/0x170 [ 459.410919] kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x2a0 [ 459.411564] rcu_process_callbacks+0xbb2/0x2320 [ 459.412318] __do_softirq+0x225/0x8ac Fix this by delaying bdput() to the end of blkdev_get() which means we have finished accessing bdev. Fixes: 77ea887 ("implement in-kernel gendisk events handling") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit e5a15e17a78d58f933d17cafedfcf7486a29f5b4 upstream. The following kernel panic was captured when running nfs server over ocfs2, at that time ocfs2_test_inode_bit() was checking whether one inode locating at "blkno" 5 was valid, that is ocfs2 root inode, its "suballoc_slot" was OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT(65535) and it was allocted from //global_inode_alloc, but here it wrongly assumed that it was got from per slot inode alloctor which would cause array overflow and trigger kernel panic. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001088 IP: [<ffffffff816f6898>] _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0 PGD 1e06ba067 PUD 1e9e7d067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP CPU: 6 PID: 24873 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 4.1.12-124.36.1.el6uek.x86_64 #2 Hardware name: Huawei CH121 V3/IT11SGCA1, BIOS 3.87 02/02/2018 RIP: _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0 RSP: e02b:ffff88005ae97908 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: ffff88005ae98000 RBX: 0000000000001088 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 0000000000001088 RBP: ffff88005ae97928 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff880212878e00 R10: 0000000000007ff0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001088 R13: ffff8800063c0aa8 R14: ffff8800650c27d0 R15: 000000000000ffff FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880218180000(0000) knlGS:ffff880218180000 CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000001088 CR3: 00000002033d0000 CR4: 0000000000042660 Call Trace: igrab+0x1e/0x60 ocfs2_get_system_file_inode+0x63/0x3a0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_test_inode_bit+0x328/0xa00 [ocfs2] ocfs2_get_parent+0xba/0x3e0 [ocfs2] reconnect_path+0xb5/0x300 exportfs_decode_fh+0xf6/0x2b0 fh_verify+0x350/0x660 [nfsd] nfsd4_putfh+0x4d/0x60 [nfsd] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x3d3/0x6f0 [nfsd] nfsd_dispatch+0xe0/0x290 [nfsd] svc_process_common+0x412/0x6a0 [sunrpc] svc_process+0x123/0x210 [sunrpc] nfsd+0xff/0x170 [nfsd] kthread+0xcb/0xf0 ret_from_fork+0x61/0x90 Code: 83 c2 02 0f b7 f2 e8 18 dc 91 ff 66 90 eb bf 0f 1f 40 00 55 48 89 e5 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 fb ba 00 00 02 00 <f0> 0f c1 17 89 d0 45 31 e4 45 31 ed c1 e8 10 66 39 d0 41 89 c6 RIP _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0 CR2: 0000000000001088 ---[ end trace 7264463cd1aac8f9 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 440ab9e10e2e6e5fd677473ee6f9e3af0f6904d6 ] At times when I'm using kgdb I see a splat on my console about suspicious RCU usage. I managed to come up with a case that could reproduce this that looked like this: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.7.0-rc4+ #609 Not tainted ----------------------------- kernel/pid.c:395 find_task_by_pid_ns() needs rcu_read_lock() protection! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffff81b6b8e988 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach+0x40/0x13c #1: ffffffd01109e9e8 (dbg_master_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kgdb_cpu_enter+0x20c/0x7ac #2: ffffffd01109ea90 (dbg_slave_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kgdb_cpu_enter+0x3ec/0x7ac stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc4+ #609 Hardware name: Google Cheza (rev3+) (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8 show_stack+0x1c/0x24 dump_stack+0xd4/0x134 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xf0/0x100 find_task_by_pid_ns+0x5c/0x80 getthread+0x8c/0xb0 gdb_serial_stub+0x9d4/0xd04 kgdb_cpu_enter+0x284/0x7ac kgdb_handle_exception+0x174/0x20c kgdb_brk_fn+0x24/0x30 call_break_hook+0x6c/0x7c brk_handler+0x20/0x5c do_debug_exception+0x1c8/0x22c el1_sync_handler+0x3c/0xe4 el1_sync+0x7c/0x100 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x38/0x420 platform_drv_probe+0x94/0xb4 really_probe+0x134/0x300 driver_probe_device+0x68/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xa8 bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xcc __device_attach+0xb4/0x13c device_initial_probe+0x18/0x20 bus_probe_device+0x38/0x98 device_add+0x38c/0x420 If I understand properly we should just be able to blanket kgdb under one big RCU read lock and the problem should go away. We'll add it to the beast-of-a-function known as kgdb_cpu_enter(). With this I no longer get any splats and things seem to work fine. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200602154729.v2.1.I70e0d4fd46d5ed2aaf0c98a355e8e1b7a5bb7e4e@changeid Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit e24c6447ccb7b1a01f9bf0aec94939e6450c0b4d ] I compiled with AddressSanitizer and I had these memory leaks while I was using the tep_parse_format function: Direct leak of 28 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fb07db49ffe in __interceptor_realloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dffe) #1 0x7fb07a724228 in extend_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:985 #2 0x7fb07a724c21 in __read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1140 #3 0x7fb07a724f78 in read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1206 #4 0x7fb07a725191 in __read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1291 #5 0x7fb07a7251df in read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1299 #6 0x7fb07a72e6c8 in process_dynamic_array_len /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:2849 #7 0x7fb07a7304b8 in process_function /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3161 #8 0x7fb07a730900 in process_arg_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3207 #9 0x7fb07a727c0b in process_arg /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1786 #10 0x7fb07a731080 in event_read_print_args /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3285 #11 0x7fb07a731722 in event_read_print /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3369 #12 0x7fb07a740054 in __tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6335 #13 0x7fb07a74047a in __parse_event /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6389 #14 0x7fb07a740536 in tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6431 #15 0x7fb07a785acf in parse_event ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:251 #16 0x7fb07a785ccd in parse_systems ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:284 #17 0x7fb07a786fb3 in read_metadata ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:593 #18 0x7fb07a78760e in ftrace_fs_source_init ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:727 #19 0x7fb07d90c19c in add_component_with_init_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1048 #20 0x7fb07d90c87b in add_source_component_with_initialize_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1127 #21 0x7fb07d90c92a in bt_graph_add_source_component ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1152 #22 0x55db11aa632e in cmd_run_ctx_create_components_from_config_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2252 #23 0x55db11aa6fda in cmd_run_ctx_create_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2347 #24 0x55db11aa780c in cmd_run ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2461 #25 0x55db11aa8a7d in main ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2673 #26 0x7fb07d5460b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2) The token variable in the process_dynamic_array_len function is allocated in the read_expect_type function, but is not freed before calling the read_token function. Free the token variable before calling read_token in order to plug the leak. Signed-off-by: Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 5a25de6df789cc805a9b8ba7ab5deef5067af47e ] Freeing chip on error may lead to an Oops at the next time the system goes to resume. Fix this by removing all snd_echo_free() calls on error. Fixes: 47b5d02 ("ALSA: Echoaudio - Add suspend support #2") Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 205d300aea75623e1ae4aa43e0d265ab9cf195fd upstream. We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port" lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble to people, so let's fix it. The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths: chain #1: serial8250_do_startup() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); disable_irq_nosync(port->irq); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) chain #2: __report_bad_irq() raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) for_each_action_of_desc() printk() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup(): do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock order. Full lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.39 #55 Not tainted ====================================================== swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89 __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93 serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0 tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a uart_open+0x1b/0x26 tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0 chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8 path_openat+0x434/0x1100 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7 kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0 console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 register_console+0x336/0x3a4 uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9 platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b really_probe+0x14a/0x422 driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130 device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b __driver_attach+0xca/0x139 bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9 bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228 driver_register+0x64/0xed do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6 do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5 do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58 kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}: __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_kernel+0x406/0x46a secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 #55 Hardware name: XXXXXX Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0xbf/0x133 ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9 check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3 __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Reported-by: Raul Rangel <[email protected]> BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Cc: stable <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a48b73eca4ceb9b8a4b97f290a065335dbcd8a04 ] With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit d26383dcb2b4b8629fde05270b4e3633be9e3d4b ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…during probe [ Upstream commit 4ce35a3617c0ac758c61122b2218b6c8c9ac9398 ] When booting j721e the following bug is printed: [ 1.154821] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99 [ 1.154827] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1 [ 1.154832] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12: [ 1.154836] #0: ffff000840030728 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8 [ 1.154852] #1: ffff80001214fdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8 [ 1.154860] #2: ffff00084060b170 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x138 [ 1.154872] irq event stamp: 63096 [ 1.154881] hardirqs last enabled at (63095): [<ffff800010b74318>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0x78 [ 1.154887] hardirqs last disabled at (63096): [<ffff800010b740d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x28/0x80 [ 1.154893] softirqs last enabled at (62254): [<ffff800010080c88>] _stext+0x488/0x564 [ 1.154899] softirqs last disabled at (62247): [<ffff8000100fdb3c>] irq_exit+0x114/0x140 [ 1.154906] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6-next-20200318-00094-g45e4089b0bd3 #221 [ 1.154911] Hardware name: Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC (DT) [ 1.154917] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 1.154923] Call trace: [ 1.154928] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 1.154933] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 1.154940] dump_stack+0xe0/0x148 [ 1.154946] ___might_sleep+0x150/0x1f0 [ 1.154952] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80 [ 1.154957] wait_for_completion_timeout+0x40/0x140 [ 1.154964] ti_sci_set_device_state+0xa0/0x158 [ 1.154969] ti_sci_cmd_get_device_exclusive+0x14/0x20 [ 1.154977] ti_sci_dev_start+0x34/0x50 [ 1.154984] genpd_runtime_resume+0x78/0x1f8 [ 1.154991] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x140 [ 1.154996] rpm_callback+0x20/0x80 [ 1.155001] rpm_resume+0x568/0x758 [ 1.155007] __pm_runtime_resume+0x44/0xb0 [ 1.155013] omap8250_probe+0x2b4/0x508 [ 1.155019] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0 [ 1.155023] really_probe+0xd4/0x318 [ 1.155028] driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8 [ 1.155033] __device_attach_driver+0x80/0xb8 [ 1.155039] bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xc0 [ 1.155044] __device_attach+0xdc/0x138 [ 1.155049] device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 [ 1.155053] bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0 [ 1.155058] deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0 [ 1.155063] process_one_work+0x280/0x6e8 [ 1.155068] worker_thread+0x48/0x430 [ 1.155073] kthread+0x108/0x138 [ 1.155079] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 To fix the bug we need to first call pm_runtime_enable() prior to any pm_runtime calls. Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 71a174b39f10b4b93223d374722aa894b5d8a82e ] b6da31b2c07c "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b2c07c ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Our static-static calculation returns a failure if the public key is of low order. We check for this when peers are added, and don't allow them to be added if they're low order, except in the case where we haven't yet been given a private key. In that case, we would defer the removal of the peer until we're given a private key, since at that point we're doing new static-static calculations which incur failures we can act on. This meant, however, that we wound up removing peers rather late in the configuration flow. Syzkaller points out that peer_remove calls flush_workqueue, which in turn might then wait for sending a handshake initiation to complete. Since handshake initiation needs the static identity lock, holding the static identity lock while calling peer_remove can result in a rare deadlock. We have precisely this case in this situation of late-stage peer removal based on an invalid public key. We can't drop the lock when removing, because then incoming handshakes might interact with a bogus static-static calculation. While the band-aid patch for this would involve breaking up the peer removal into two steps like wg_peer_remove_all does, in order to solve the locking issue, there's actually a much more elegant way of fixing this: If the static-static calculation succeeds with one private key, it *must* succeed with all others, because all 32-byte strings map to valid private keys, thanks to clamping. That means we can get rid of this silly dance and locking headaches of removing peers late in the configuration flow, and instead just reject them early on, regardless of whether the device has yet been assigned a private key. For the case where the device doesn't yet have a private key, we safely use zeros just for the purposes of checking for low order points by way of checking the output of the calculation. The following PoC will trigger the deadlock: ip link add wg0 type wireguard ip addr add 10.0.0.1/24 dev wg0 ip link set wg0 up ping -f 10.0.0.2 & while true; do wg set wg0 private-key /dev/null peer AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA= allowed-ips 10.0.0.0/24 endpoint 10.0.0.3:1234 wg set wg0 private-key <(echo AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=) done [ 0.949105] ====================================================== [ 0.949550] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 0.950143] 5.5.0-debug+ #18 Not tainted [ 0.950431] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 0.950959] wg/89 is trying to acquire lock: [ 0.951252] ffff8880333e2128 ((wq_completion)wg-kex-wg0){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0xe3/0x12f0 [ 0.951865] [ 0.951865] but task is already holding lock: [ 0.952280] ffff888032819bc0 (&wg->static_identity.lock){++++}, at: wg_set_device+0x95d/0xcc0 [ 0.953011] [ 0.953011] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 0.953011] [ 0.953651] [ 0.953651] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 0.954292] [ 0.954292] -> #2 (&wg->static_identity.lock){++++}: [ 0.954804] lock_acquire+0x127/0x350 [ 0.955133] down_read+0x83/0x410 [ 0.955428] wg_noise_handshake_create_initiation+0x97/0x700 [ 0.955885] wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x13a/0x280 [ 0.956401] wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x10/0x20 [ 0.956841] process_one_work+0x806/0x1500 [ 0.957167] worker_thread+0x8c/0xcb0 [ 0.957549] kthread+0x2ee/0x3b0 [ 0.957792] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 0.958234] [ 0.958234] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&peer->transmit_handshake_work)){+.+.}: [ 0.958808] lock_acquire+0x127/0x350 [ 0.959075] process_one_work+0x7ab/0x1500 [ 0.959369] worker_thread+0x8c/0xcb0 [ 0.959639] kthread+0x2ee/0x3b0 [ 0.959896] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 0.960346] [ 0.960346] -> #0 ((wq_completion)wg-kex-wg0){+.+.}: [ 0.960945] check_prev_add+0x167/0x1e20 [ 0.961351] __lock_acquire+0x2012/0x3170 [ 0.961725] lock_acquire+0x127/0x350 [ 0.961990] flush_workqueue+0x106/0x12f0 [ 0.962280] peer_remove_after_dead+0x160/0x220 [ 0.962600] wg_set_device+0xa24/0xcc0 [ 0.962994] genl_rcv_msg+0x52f/0xe90 [ 0.963298] netlink_rcv_skb+0x111/0x320 [ 0.963618] genl_rcv+0x1f/0x30 [ 0.963853] netlink_unicast+0x3f6/0x610 [ 0.964245] netlink_sendmsg+0x700/0xb80 [ 0.964586] __sys_sendto+0x1dd/0x2c0 [ 0.964854] __x64_sys_sendto+0xd8/0x1b0 [ 0.965141] do_syscall_64+0x90/0xd9a [ 0.965408] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 0.965769] [ 0.965769] other info that might help us debug this: [ 0.965769] [ 0.966337] Chain exists of: [ 0.966337] (wq_completion)wg-kex-wg0 --> (work_completion)(&peer->transmit_handshake_work) --> &wg->static_identity.lock [ 0.966337] [ 0.967417] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 0.967417] [ 0.967836] CPU0 CPU1 [ 0.968155] ---- ---- [ 0.968497] lock(&wg->static_identity.lock); [ 0.968779] lock((work_completion)(&peer->transmit_handshake_work)); [ 0.969345] lock(&wg->static_identity.lock); [ 0.969809] lock((wq_completion)wg-kex-wg0); [ 0.970146] [ 0.970146] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 0.970146] [ 0.970531] 5 locks held by wg/89: [ 0.970908] #0: ffffffff827433c8 (cb_lock){++++}, at: genl_rcv+0x10/0x30 [ 0.971400] #1: ffffffff82743480 (genl_mutex){+.+.}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x642/0xe90 [ 0.971924] #2: ffffffff827160c0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: wg_set_device+0x9f/0xcc0 [ 0.972488] #3: ffff888032819de0 (&wg->device_update_lock){+.+.}, at: wg_set_device+0xb0/0xcc0 [ 0.973095] #4: ffff888032819bc0 (&wg->static_identity.lock){++++}, at: wg_set_device+0x95d/0xcc0 [ 0.973653] [ 0.973653] stack backtrace: [ 0.973932] CPU: 1 PID: 89 Comm: wg Not tainted 5.5.0-debug+ #18 [ 0.974476] Call Trace: [ 0.974638] dump_stack+0x97/0xe0 [ 0.974869] check_noncircular+0x312/0x3e0 [ 0.975132] ? print_circular_bug+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 0.975410] ? __kernel_text_address+0x9/0x30 [ 0.975727] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x51/0x90 [ 0.976024] check_prev_add+0x167/0x1e20 [ 0.976367] ? graph_lock+0x70/0x160 [ 0.976682] __lock_acquire+0x2012/0x3170 [ 0.976998] ? register_lock_class+0x1140/0x1140 [ 0.977323] lock_acquire+0x127/0x350 [ 0.977627] ? flush_workqueue+0xe3/0x12f0 [ 0.977890] flush_workqueue+0x106/0x12f0 [ 0.978147] ? flush_workqueue+0xe3/0x12f0 [ 0.978410] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 0.978662] ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 [ 0.978919] ? queue_rcu_work+0x60/0x60 [ 0.979166] ? netif_napi_del+0x151/0x3b0 [ 0.979501] ? peer_remove_after_dead+0x160/0x220 [ 0.979871] peer_remove_after_dead+0x160/0x220 [ 0.980232] wg_set_device+0xa24/0xcc0 [ 0.980516] ? deref_stack_reg+0x8e/0xc0 [ 0.980801] ? set_peer+0xe10/0xe10 [ 0.981040] ? __ww_mutex_check_waiters+0x150/0x150 [ 0.981430] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x163/0x270 [ 0.981719] ? genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse+0x13f/0x310 [ 0.982078] genl_rcv_msg+0x52f/0xe90 [ 0.982348] ? genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse+0x310/0x310 [ 0.982690] ? register_lock_class+0x1140/0x1140 [ 0.983049] netlink_rcv_skb+0x111/0x320 [ 0.983298] ? genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse+0x310/0x310 [ 0.983645] ? netlink_ack+0x880/0x880 [ 0.983888] genl_rcv+0x1f/0x30 [ 0.984168] netlink_unicast+0x3f6/0x610 [ 0.984443] ? netlink_detachskb+0x60/0x60 [ 0.984729] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 0.984976] netlink_sendmsg+0x700/0xb80 [ 0.985220] ? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0xa60/0xa60 [ 0.985533] __sys_sendto+0x1dd/0x2c0 [ 0.985763] ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 [ 0.986039] ? sockfd_lookup_light+0x17/0x160 [ 0.986397] ? __sys_recvmsg+0x8c/0xf0 [ 0.986711] ? __sys_recvmsg_sock+0xd0/0xd0 [ 0.987018] __x64_sys_sendto+0xd8/0x1b0 [ 0.987283] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x39b/0x5a0 [ 0.987666] do_syscall_64+0x90/0xd9a [ 0.987903] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 0.988223] RIP: 0033:0x7fe77c12003e [ 0.988508] Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 4 [ 0.989666] RSP: 002b:00007fffada2ed58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 0.990137] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe77c159d48 RCX: 00007fe77c12003e [ 0.990583] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 000055fd1d38e020 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 0.991091] RBP: 000055fd1d38e020 R08: 000055fd1cb63358 R09: 000000000000000c [ 0.991568] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000002c [ 0.992014] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 000055fd1d38e020 R15: 0000000000000001 Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ec31c2676a10e064878927b243fada8c2fb0c03c) Bug: 152722841 Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Change-Id: I860bfac72c98c8c9b26f4490b4f346dc67892f87

commit ca10845a56856fff4de3804c85e6424d0f6d0cde upstream While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit c7de87ff9dac5f396f62d584f3908f80ddc0e07b upstream. [ This problem is in mainline, but only rt has the chops to be able to detect it. ] Lockdep reports a circular lock dependency between serv->sv_lock and softirq_ctl.lock on system shutdown, when using a kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, and a nfs mount exists. This is due to the definition of spin_lock_bh on rt: local_bh_disable(); rt_spin_lock(lock); which forces a softirq_ctl.lock -> serv->sv_lock dependency. This is not a problem as long as _every_ lock of serv->sv_lock is a: spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); but there is one of the form: spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock); This is what is causing the circular dependency splat. The spin_lock() grabs the lock without first grabbing softirq_ctl.lock via local_bh_disable. If later on in the critical region, someone does a local_bh_disable, we get a serv->sv_lock -> softirq_ctrl.lock dependency established. Deadlock. Fix is to make serv->sv_lock be locked with spin_lock_bh everywhere, no exceptions. [ OK ] Stopped target NFS client services. Stopping Logout off all iSCSI sessions on shutdown... Stopping NFS server and services... [ 109.442380] [ 109.442385] ====================================================== [ 109.442386] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 109.442387] 5.10.16-rt30 #1 Not tainted [ 109.442389] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 109.442390] nfsd/1032 is trying to acquire lock: [ 109.442392] ffff994237617f60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442405] [ 109.442405] but task is already holding lock: [ 109.442406] ffff994245cb00b0 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: svc_close_list+0x1f/0x90 [ 109.442415] [ 109.442415] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 109.442415] [ 109.442416] [ 109.442416] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 109.442417] [ 109.442417] -> #1 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 109.442421] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442428] svc_add_new_perm_xprt+0x42/0xa0 [ 109.442430] svc_addsock+0x135/0x220 [ 109.442434] write_ports+0x4b3/0x620 [ 109.442438] nfsctl_transaction_write+0x45/0x80 [ 109.442440] vfs_write+0xff/0x420 [ 109.442444] ksys_write+0x4f/0xc0 [ 109.442446] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ 109.442450] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 109.442454] [ 109.442454] -> #0 ((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: [ 109.442457] __lock_acquire+0x1264/0x20b0 [ 109.442463] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x400 [ 109.442466] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442469] __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442471] svc_xprt_do_enqueue+0xc0/0x4d0 [ 109.442474] svc_close_list+0x60/0x90 [ 109.442476] svc_close_net+0x49/0x1a0 [ 109.442478] svc_shutdown_net+0x12/0x40 [ 109.442480] nfsd_destroy+0xc5/0x180 [ 109.442482] nfsd+0x1bc/0x270 [ 109.442483] kthread+0x194/0x1b0 [ 109.442487] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 109.442492] [ 109.442492] other info that might help us debug this: [ 109.442492] [ 109.442493] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 109.442493] [ 109.442493] CPU0 CPU1 [ 109.442494] ---- ---- [ 109.442495] lock(&serv->sv_lock); [ 109.442496] lock((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock); [ 109.442498] lock(&serv->sv_lock); [ 109.442499] lock((softirq_ctrl.lock).lock); [ 109.442501] [ 109.442501] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 109.442501] [ 109.442501] 3 locks held by nfsd/1032: [ 109.442503] #0: ffffffff93b49258 (nfsd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nfsd+0x19a/0x270 [ 109.442508] #1: ffff994245cb00b0 (&serv->sv_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: svc_close_list+0x1f/0x90 [ 109.442512] #2: ffffffff93a81b20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0x5/0xc0 [ 109.442518] [ 109.442518] stack backtrace: [ 109.442519] CPU: 0 PID: 1032 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 5.10.16-rt30 #1 [ 109.442522] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF/X9DRL-3F/iF, BIOS 3.2 09/22/2015 [ 109.442524] Call Trace: [ 109.442527] dump_stack+0x77/0x97 [ 109.442533] check_noncircular+0xdc/0xf0 [ 109.442546] __lock_acquire+0x1264/0x20b0 [ 109.442553] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x400 [ 109.442564] rt_spin_lock+0x2b/0xc0 [ 109.442570] __local_bh_disable_ip+0xd9/0x270 [ 109.442573] svc_xprt_do_enqueue+0xc0/0x4d0 [ 109.442577] svc_close_list+0x60/0x90 [ 109.442581] svc_close_net+0x49/0x1a0 [ 109.442585] svc_shutdown_net+0x12/0x40 [ 109.442588] nfsd_destroy+0xc5/0x180 [ 109.442590] nfsd+0x1bc/0x270 [ 109.442595] kthread+0x194/0x1b0 [ 109.442600] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 109.518225] nfsd: last server has exited, flushing export cache [ OK ] Stopped NFSv4 ID-name mapping service. [ OK ] Stopped GSSAPI Proxy Daemon. [ OK ] Stopped NFS Mount Daemon. [ OK ] Stopped NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking.. Fixes: 719f8bc ("svcrpc: fix xpt_list traversal locking on shutdown") Signed-off-by: Joe Korty <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2d3a8e2deddea6c89961c422ec0c5b851e648c14 ] In blkdev_get() we call __blkdev_get() to do some internal jobs and if there is some errors in __blkdev_get(), the bdput() is called which means we have released the refcount of the bdev (actually the refcount of the bdev inode). This means we cannot access bdev after that point. But acctually bdev is still accessed in blkdev_get() after calling __blkdev_get(). This results in use-after-free if the refcount is the last one we released in __blkdev_get(). Let's take a look at the following scenerio: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 blkdev_open blkdev_open Remove disk bd_acquire blkdev_get __blkdev_get del_gendisk bdev_unhash_inode bd_acquire bdev_get_gendisk bd_forget failed because of unhashed bdput bdput (the last one) bdev_evict_inode access bdev => use after free [ 459.350216] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.351190] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88806c815a80 by task syz-executor.0/20132 [ 459.352347] [ 459.352594] CPU: 0 PID: 20132 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #2 [ 459.353628] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 459.354947] Call Trace: [ 459.355337] dump_stack+0x111/0x19e [ 459.355879] ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.356523] print_address_description+0x60/0x223 [ 459.357248] ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.357887] kasan_report.cold+0xae/0x2d8 [ 459.358503] __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0 [ 459.359120] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [ 459.359784] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x37b/0x580 [ 459.360465] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [ 459.361123] ? finish_task_switch+0x125/0x600 [ 459.361812] ? finish_task_switch+0xee/0x600 [ 459.362471] ? mark_held_locks+0xf0/0xf0 [ 459.363108] ? __schedule+0x96f/0x21d0 [ 459.363716] lock_acquire+0x111/0x320 [ 459.364285] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.364846] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.365390] __mutex_lock+0xf9/0x12a0 [ 459.365948] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.366493] ? bdev_evict_inode+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 459.367130] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.367678] ? destroy_inode+0xbc/0x110 [ 459.368261] ? mutex_trylock+0x1a0/0x1a0 [ 459.368867] ? __blkdev_get+0x3e6/0x1280 [ 459.369463] ? bdev_disk_changed+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 459.370114] ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.370656] blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0 [ 459.371178] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 459.371774] ? __blkdev_get+0x1280/0x1280 [ 459.372383] ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680 [ 459.373002] ? lock_acquire+0x111/0x320 [ 459.373587] ? bd_acquire+0x21/0x2c0 [ 459.374134] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250 [ 459.374780] blkdev_open+0x202/0x290 [ 459.375325] do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050 [ 459.375924] ? blkdev_get_by_dev+0x70/0x70 [ 459.376543] ? __x64_sys_fchdir+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 459.377192] ? inode_permission+0xbe/0x3a0 [ 459.377818] path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50 [ 459.378392] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280 [ 459.379016] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.379802] ? path_lookupat.isra.0+0x900/0x900 [ 459.380489] ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140 [ 459.381093] do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 [ 459.381654] ? may_open_dev+0xf0/0xf0 [ 459.382214] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 [ 459.382816] ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680 [ 459.383425] ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140 [ 459.384024] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250 [ 459.384668] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 459.385280] ? __alloc_fd+0x448/0x560 [ 459.385841] do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500 [ 459.386386] ? filp_open+0x70/0x70 [ 459.386911] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 459.387610] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x55/0x1c0 [ 459.388342] ? do_syscall_64+0x1a/0x520 [ 459.388930] do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520 [ 459.389490] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.390248] RIP: 0033:0x416211 [ 459.390720] Code: 75 14 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 04 19 00 00 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 0a fa ff ff 48 89 04 24 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 8b 3c 24 48 89 c2 e8 53 fa ff ff 48 89 d0 48 83 c4 08 48 3d 01 [ 459.393483] RSP: 002b:00007fe45dfe9a60 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002 [ 459.394610] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe45dfea6d4 RCX: 0000000000416211 [ 459.395678] RDX: 00007fe45dfe9b0a RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fe45dfe9b00 [ 459.396758] RBP: 000000000076bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000a [ 459.397930] R10: 0000000000000075 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00000000ffffffff [ 459.399022] R13: 0000000000000bd9 R14: 00000000004cdb80 R15: 000000000076bf2c [ 459.400168] [ 459.400430] Allocated by task 20132: [ 459.401038] kasan_kmalloc+0xbf/0xe0 [ 459.401652] kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280 [ 459.402330] bdev_alloc_inode+0x18/0x40 [ 459.402970] alloc_inode+0x5f/0x180 [ 459.403510] iget5_locked+0x57/0xd0 [ 459.404095] bdget+0x94/0x4e0 [ 459.404607] bd_acquire+0xfa/0x2c0 [ 459.405113] blkdev_open+0x110/0x290 [ 459.405702] do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050 [ 459.406340] path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50 [ 459.406926] do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280 [ 459.407471] do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500 [ 459.408010] do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520 [ 459.408572] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 459.409415] [ 459.409679] Freed by task 1262: [ 459.410212] __kasan_slab_free+0x129/0x170 [ 459.410919] kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x2a0 [ 459.411564] rcu_process_callbacks+0xbb2/0x2320 [ 459.412318] __do_softirq+0x225/0x8ac Fix this by delaying bdput() to the end of blkdev_get() which means we have finished accessing bdev. Fixes: 77ea887 ("implement in-kernel gendisk events handling") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Change-Id: Id60ab5ab4871856d3ed2570a13912253932558c5 Git-commit: 49289b1fa5a67011c4010e4e9c801b9d565ce395 Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm Signed-off-by: urevanth <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 4deb550bc3b698a1f03d0332cde3df154d1b6c1e ] label err_eni_release is reachable when eni_start() fail. In eni_start() it calls dev->phy->start() in the last step, if start() fail we don't need to call phy->stop(), if start() is never called, we neither need to call phy->stop(), otherwise null-ptr-deref will happen. In order to fix this issue, don't call phy->stop() in label err_eni_release [ 4.875714] ================================================================== [ 4.876091] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.876433] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task modprobe/95 [ 4.876778] [ 4.876862] CPU: 0 PID: 95 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7-00090-gdcc0b49040c7 #2 [ 4.877290] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-48-gd94 [ 4.877876] Call Trace: [ 4.878009] dump_stack+0x7d/0xa3 [ 4.878191] kasan_report.cold+0x10c/0x10e [ 4.878410] ? __slab_free+0x2f0/0x340 [ 4.878612] ? suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.878832] suni_stop+0x47/0x100 [suni] [ 4.879043] eni_do_release+0x3b/0x70 [eni] [ 4.879269] eni_init_one.cold+0x1152/0x1747 [eni] [ 4.879528] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7b/0xd0 [ 4.879768] ? eni_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [eni] [ 4.879990] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 [ 4.880226] ? eni_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [eni] [ 4.880448] local_pci_probe+0x6f/0xb0 [ 4.880650] pci_device_probe+0x171/0x240 [ 4.880864] ? pci_device_remove+0xe0/0xe0 [ 4.881086] ? kernfs_create_link+0xb6/0x110 [ 4.881315] ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0x76/0xe0 [ 4.881594] really_probe+0x161/0x420 [ 4.881791] driver_probe_device+0x6d/0xd0 [ 4.882010] device_driver_attach+0x82/0x90 [ 4.882233] ? device_driver_attach+0x90/0x90 [ 4.882465] __driver_attach+0x60/0x100 [ 4.882671] ? device_driver_attach+0x90/0x90 [ 4.882903] bus_for_each_dev+0xe1/0x140 [ 4.883114] ? subsys_dev_iter_exit+0x10/0x10 [ 4.883346] ? klist_node_init+0x61/0x80 [ 4.883557] bus_add_driver+0x254/0x2a0 [ 4.883764] driver_register+0xd3/0x150 [ 4.883971] ? 0xffffffffc0038000 [ 4.884149] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x250 [ 4.884355] ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_finish+0x150/0x150 [ 4.884674] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.884875] ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x84/0xa0 [ 4.885150] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.885352] ? unpoison_range+0xf/0x30 [ 4.885557] do_init_module+0xf8/0x350 [ 4.885760] load_module+0x3fe6/0x4340 [ 4.885960] ? vm_unmap_ram+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 4.886166] ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x84/0xa0 [ 4.886441] ? module_frob_arch_sections+0x20/0x20 [ 4.886697] ? __do_sys_finit_module+0x108/0x170 [ 4.886941] __do_sys_finit_module+0x108/0x170 [ 4.887178] ? __ia32_sys_init_module+0x40/0x40 [ 4.887419] ? file_open_root+0x200/0x200 [ 4.887634] ? do_sys_open+0x85/0xe0 [ 4.887826] ? filp_open+0x50/0x50 [ 4.888009] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x4d/0x60 [ 4.888287] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x2f/0x130 [ 4.888547] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ 4.888739] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 4.889010] RIP: 0033:0x7ff62fcf1cf7 [ 4.889202] Code: 48 89 57 30 48 8b 04 24 48 89 47 38 e9 1d a0 02 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f71 [ 4.890172] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6644ade8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 4.890570] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000f2ca70 RCX: 00007ff62fcf1cf7 [ 4.890944] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000f2b9e0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 4.891318] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 4.891691] R10: 00007ff62fd55300 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000f2b9e0 [ 4.892064] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000f2bdd0 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 4.892439] ================================================================== Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 90bd070aae6c4fb5d302f9c4b9c88be60c8197ec upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 #2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 #3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] #4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 #5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 #6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 #7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 #2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 #3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 #4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d #5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] #7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a7c033 ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 5bbf219328849e83878bddb7c226d8d42e84affc ] An out of bounds write happens when setting the default power state. KASAN sees this as: [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in radeon_atombios_parse_power_table_1_3+0x1837/0x1998 [radeon] Write of size 4 at addr ffff88810178d858 by task systemd-udevd/157 CPU: 0 PID: 157 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.12.0-E620 #50 Hardware name: eMachines eMachines E620 /Nile , BIOS V1.03 09/30/2008 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa5/0xe6 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x239 kasan_report+0x170/0x1a8 radeon_atombios_parse_power_table_1_3+0x1837/0x1998 [radeon] radeon_atombios_get_power_modes+0x144/0x1888 [radeon] radeon_pm_init+0x1019/0x1904 [radeon] rs690_init+0x76e/0x84a [radeon] radeon_device_init+0x1c1a/0x21e5 [radeon] radeon_driver_load_kms+0xf5/0x30b [radeon] drm_dev_register+0x255/0x4a0 [drm] radeon_pci_probe+0x246/0x2f6 [radeon] pci_device_probe+0x1aa/0x294 really_probe+0x30e/0x850 driver_probe_device+0xe6/0x135 device_driver_attach+0xc1/0xf8 __driver_attach+0x13f/0x146 bus_for_each_dev+0xfa/0x146 bus_add_driver+0x2b3/0x447 driver_register+0x242/0x2c1 do_one_initcall+0x149/0x2fd do_init_module+0x1ae/0x573 load_module+0x4dee/0x5cca __do_sys_finit_module+0xf1/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Without KASAN, this will manifest later when the kernel attempts to allocate memory that was stomped, since it collides with the inline slab freelist pointer: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 781 Comm: openrc-run.sh Tainted: G W 5.10.12-gentoo-E620 #2 Hardware name: eMachines eMachines E620 /Nile , BIOS V1.03 09/30/2008 RIP: 0010:kfree+0x115/0x230 Code: 89 c5 e8 75 ea ff ff 48 8b 00 0f ba e0 09 72 63 e8 1f f4 ff ff 41 89 c4 48 8b 45 00 0f ba e0 10 72 0a 48 8b 45 08 a8 01 75 02 <0f> 0b 44 89 e1 48 c7 c2 00 f0 ff ff be 06 00 00 00 48 d3 e2 48 c7 RSP: 0018:ffffb42f40267e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffd61280ee8d88 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 000000008010000d RDX: 4000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffba1360b0 RDI: ffffd61280ee8d80 RBP: ffffd61280ee8d80 R08: ffffffffb91bebdf R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8fe2c1047ac8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000100 FS: 00007fe80eff6b68(0000) GS:ffff8fe339c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe80eec7bc0 CR3: 0000000038012000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: __free_fdtable+0x16/0x1f put_files_struct+0x81/0x9b do_exit+0x433/0x94d do_group_exit+0xa6/0xa6 __x64_sys_exit_group+0xf/0xf do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fe80ef64bea Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7fe80ef64bc0. RSP: 002b:00007ffdb1c47528 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fe80ef64bea RDX: 00007fe80ef64f60 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007fe80ee2c620 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fe80eff41e0 R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007fe80edf9cd0 Modules linked in: radeon(+) ath5k(+) snd_hda_codec_realtek ... Use a valid power_state index when initializing the "flags" and "misc" and "misc2" fields. Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211537 Reported-by: Erhard F. <[email protected]> Fixes: a48b9b4 ("drm/radeon/kms/pm: add asic specific callbacks for getting power state (v2)") Fixes: 79daedc ("drm/radeon/kms: minor pm cleanups") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

KVM? #2

KVM? #2

RusJJ commented Nov 3, 2019

KVM? #2

KVM? #2

Comments

RusJJ commented Nov 3, 2019