Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusing Active hours #141

Open
narayan954 opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Confusing Active hours #141

narayan954 opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@narayan954
Copy link

Description:

Active hours generated in our github unwrapped seem confusing. We don't know the time zone it uses. It should either use our timezone from github or provide us the context (Like 11am IST). I'm not sure of the current implementation but categorizing "night owl" with most active hour as 11 am conflicted with the other unwrap I generated from githubunwrapped.com which gave around 2 am.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Generate your unwrapped
  2. Check the day night cycle stat

Expected behavior:

Some context

Actual behavior:

image
No context

@narayan954 narayan954 added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 15, 2023
@samad-yar-khan
Copy link
Contributor

@narayan954 We calculate the day night stats based on the opened PR timings while githubunwrapped.com does it using commits, hence this difference in data. Thanks for opening this issue, the cards wordings can be improved to convey what it shows, or we can maybe update the underlying logic.

@narayan954
Copy link
Author

narayan954 commented Dec 16, 2023

@narayan954 We calculate the day night stats based on the opened PR timings while githubunwrapped.com does it using commits, hence this difference in data. Thanks for opening this issue, the cards wordings can be improved to convey what it shows, or we can maybe update the underlying logic.

Great, now I understand! perhaps it'd be better if we update wordings to something like "Most PRs opened around". That'd be clearer, because I make commits mostly around 2 am only and most of those commits don't go into PRs. Or as you said updating underlying logic could be better because commits convey more than a PR does.

@samad-yar-khan
Copy link
Contributor

Great, now I understand! perhaps it'd be better if we update wordings to something like "Most PRs opened around". That'd be clearer, because I make commits mostly around 2 am only and most of those commits don't go into PRs. Or as you said updating underlying logic could be better because commits convey more than a PR does.

@narayan954 Thanks for the feedback, we will move to commits soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants