You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure if all the libraries follow that guideline. For example, Ohm is stable and currently at version 2, but it was also production ready in the 0.1.x series.
This might not be appropriate in a repository called microrb but I thought I would bring it up here.
It would be nice to have quality metrics. There are two ways to do this in my mind one is objective metrics.
This library has no monkey patching
This library has some other objective metric
The other option is badges of approval, from certain groups/members in the community.
There are several people in the ruby community that I would be very keen to hear as having approved a library, seeing as that is a bit much work for one person, then having groups that rate libraries on certain quality principles would be nice.
The idea is that we should be able to easily display a list of libs that are >= 1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: