Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Modify Meshery Operator's behaviour to provide intelligent networking abstractions #331

Open
humblenginr opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 9 comments
Open

Modify Meshery Operator's behaviour to provide intelligent networking abstractions #331

humblenginr opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 9 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed issue/design required Design specification needed issue/remind Issue progress check issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@humblenginr
Copy link
Member

Current Behavior

Users of Meshery bump into some networking issues with meshery-broker(the pub-sub communication platform for meshery). One such example is Minikube which does not have a default load-balancer implementation.

Desired Behavior

  1. Make Meshery Operator self-discovering and self-reporting its static configuration to Meshery Server.
  2. Make Meshery Operator / Meshery Server intelligent enough to change networking based on what it thinks networking should be, but always allow for manual user override.

Contributor Guides and Resources
@humblenginr humblenginr added the kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature label Jul 20, 2022
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 20, 2022

Thanks for opening this issue. A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please review the Layer5 Contributors' Welcome Guide, engage in the discussion forum, and be sure to join the community Slack.

@humblenginr humblenginr added the issue/design required Design specification needed label Jul 20, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled with 'design-required'. Note that prior to commencing on implementation, a design specification needs to be created and reviewed for approval. See Creating a Functional Specification to create a design spec.

        Be sure to join the community, if you haven't yet and please leave a ⭐ star on the project 😄

@humblenginr humblenginr transferred this issue from meshery/meshery Jul 20, 2022
@leecalcote
Copy link
Member

@sudo-NithishKarthik related issue: #333

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 4, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Sep 4, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 14, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 14, 2022
@humblenginr humblenginr reopened this Sep 26, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 6, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 6, 2022
@deepeshaburse deepeshaburse added issue/remind Issue progress check and removed issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time labels Oct 8, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2022

Checking in... it has been awhile since we've heard from you on this issue. Are you still working on it? Please let us know and please don't hesitate to contact a MeshMate or any other community member for assistance.

        Be sure to join the community, if you haven't yet and please leave a ⭐ star on the project 😄

@github-actions github-actions bot reopened this Oct 8, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 22, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Nov 22, 2022
@leecalcote leecalcote added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Nov 22, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Nov 22, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 6, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jan 6, 2023
@leecalcote leecalcote added the issue/willfix This issue will be worked on label Jan 6, 2023
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jan 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed issue/design required Design specification needed issue/remind Issue progress check issue/willfix This issue will be worked on kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@leecalcote @humblenginr @deepeshaburse