Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Lack of visibility in cost-savings for tortoise #411

Open
randytqwjp opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Lack of visibility in cost-savings for tortoise #411

randytqwjp opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
@randytqwjp

Comments

@randytqwjp
Copy link
Collaborator

We want to be able to view the effectiveness of tortoise in reducing costs as well as engineering toil
@randytqwjp randytqwjp self-assigned this Aug 23, 2024
@randytqwjp randytqwjp mentioned this issue Aug 23, 2024
Merged
@randytqwjp randytqwjp changed the title Lack of visibility in cost-savings for tortoise. Lack of visibility in cost-savings for tortoise Aug 23, 2024
@randytqwjp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

default tags in datadog metrics make it impossible to join queries on hpa replica changes and cpu requests. Therefore we have to calculate in tortoise itself.

@randytqwjp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sanposhiho I'll be creating a few test releases to see how it integrates with datadog. I'll base it off a separate branch.

@sanposhiho
Copy link
Collaborator

@randytqwjp
When you cut a release for a test, please use v1.0.1-alpha or something so that other people don't mistakenly assume your release is the stable newest release.

@sanposhiho
Copy link
Collaborator

@randytqwjp
also, set them as a pre-release, and not as the latest release.
Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 17 52 47

@randytqwjp randytqwjp mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@randytqwjp randytqwjp

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sanposhiho @randytqwjp